How many medicare programs are being investigated in mn

Checked on January 24, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The current reporting does not identify any Medicare programs under investigation in Minnesota; instead, federal and state actions center on Minnesota’s Medicaid programs — specifically a probe and audit of 14 “high‑risk” Medicaid services that have been paused for review [1] [2]. Multiple federal notices and prosecutions cited in the coverage refer to Medicaid program integrity concerns, not Medicare program investigations [3] [4].

1. The question unpacked — Medicare versus Medicaid and why the distinction matters

The headlines about Minnesota’s health‑program scandal conflate multiple programs and investigations, but the documents and press releases provided focus on Medicaid — the state‑federal program for low‑income people — rather than Medicare, which serves seniors and certain disabled Americans; none of the sourced materials allege that Medicare plans or Medicare‑administered programs in Minnesota are the subject of a named federal compliance action or the specific 14‑program audit [1] [3] [5]. This is a critical distinction because CMS has separate oversight streams for Medicare and Medicaid and the enforcement actions described (with threatened withholding of Medicaid matching funds and a state-ordered audit) stem from perceived deficiencies in Minnesota’s Medicaid program integrity [3] [6].

2. What is being investigated: 14 high‑risk Medicaid services

State and federal reporting show Minnesota ordered a third‑party audit and temporary pauses in payments for 14 high‑risk Medicaid services to detect suspicious billing and review use of public funds, a move announced by the governor and DHS that explicitly refers to Medicaid programs and not Medicare plans [1]. That action followed federal scrutiny and a CMS notice regarding Minnesota’s Medicaid State Plan compliance on prevention, detection and investigation of fraud, waste, and abuse [3], and the attorney general’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit has filed criminal charges in at least one large Medicaid fraud case [4].

3. Federal escalation and contested numbers: CMS notices, withholding threats and disputed estimates

CMS has initiated a compliance process and issued a notice of opportunity for a hearing concerning Minnesota’s Medicaid program integrity, a step that could lead to withholding federal Medicaid funds until the state comes into compliance [3]. Some commentators and investigative pieces frame the situation as far broader — citing prosecutor estimates that implicate many programs and large dollar amounts — but state officials and others have pushed back on sensational estimates [7] [2]. The sources show the formal, named federal action and the state’s 14‑program audit are about Medicaid integrity; they do not document a parallel, formal probe of Medicare programs in Minnesota [3] [1] [2].

4. Local prosecutions and program‑level audits are focused on Medicaid providers

Criminal charges announced by Minnesota’s Attorney General against a home‑health provider involve theft from Minnesota Medical Assistance (Medicaid) for more than $3 million, reinforcing that recent law‑enforcement attention has targeted Medicaid provider fraud rather than Medicare program operations [4]. Federal prosecutors and Congressional requests for documents referenced in reporting ask about Medicaid program integrity and high‑risk billing practices in Minnesota, again pointing to Medicaid‑centered scrutiny [8] [4].

5. Counterpoints, context and reporting limits

There are alternative narratives in opinion and policy outlets that argue the defect is systemic across multiple federal benefit programs, and some journalists and commentators have suggested fraud estimates that would implicate many programs or billions of dollars [7] [9]. However, the sourced material for official actions — CMS notices, the governor’s pause of payments, and the attorney general’s charges — document targeted action on 14 Medicaid services and do not show a corresponding list of Medicare programs under formal investigation. The available reporting does not support asserting that any Medicare program is currently under federal or state investigation in Minnesota; if such investigations exist, they were not identified in the provided sources [3] [1] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Which 14 Medicaid services in Minnesota are designated 'high‑risk' and what billing behaviors triggered the audit?
What steps does CMS require for a state Medicaid program to regain compliance and have withheld funds restored?
Have any Medicare Advantage plans or Medicare contractors in Minnesota been the subject of federal probes separate from Medicaid actions?