Which oral GLP‑1 and multi‑agonist drugs are nearest FDA approval and how might their costs differ from injectables?

Checked on January 14, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Two oral GLP‑1 pills are effectively already at the finish line: Novo Nordisk’s oral semaglutide (Wegovy pill) received FDA approval in late 2025 with a U.S. launch planned for early January 2026, and Eli Lilly’s small‑molecule oral GLP‑1 orforglipron has an NDA under review with an expedited priority pathway and a decision anticipated in early 2026 [1] [2] [3]. Several next‑generation multi‑agonist injectables and oral dual‑agonists—most notably Novo Nordisk’s CagriSema (semaglutide+cagrilintide) and investigational triple agonists like retatrutide—are in regulatory review or late‑stage trials and are likely to shape price and access dynamics if approved in 2026 [4] [5].

1. Which oral GLP‑1s are nearest FDA approval — the current front‑runners

Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy tablet (oral semaglutide 25 mg) is the first oral GLP‑1 approved by the FDA for chronic weight management and is being positioned for a U.S. commercial rollout in early January 2026 after the December 2025 approval announcement [1] [6]. Eli Lilly’s orforglipron, a small‑molecule, non‑peptide oral GLP‑1 that can be taken without food or water restrictions, has completed late‑stage filing and was granted an FDA Commissioner’s National Priority/priority review, with industry reporting an expected decision in early 2026 [7] [3] [2]. Industry analysts and trade press treat these two as the immediate competitive set in the oral GLP‑1 space [8] [9].

2. Which multi‑agonist drugs are closest — injectables and combination therapies to watch

Beyond single‑target oral GLP‑1s, a wave of “GLP‑1+” and multi‑agonist medicines are in late development: Novo Nordisk has submitted CagriSema (a fixed‑dose injectable combining semaglutide and the amylin analogue cagrilintide) to the FDA with an expected decision in 2026, and retatrutide (a GLP‑1/GIP/glucagon triple agonist) and other multi‑agonists have reported strong weight‑loss signals in trials and are widely cited as next‑generation entrants [4] [5]. Industry reporting frames these products as potential efficacy‑differentiators relative to single‑pathway GLP‑1 therapies, but most remain subject to ongoing regulatory review and final labeling decisions [4] [5].

3. How might costs differ between oral agents, multi‑agonists and injectables?

Public reporting and company statements suggest multiple, sometimes conflicting, pricing signals: Novo Nordisk’s press release touts the Wegovy pill as being offered at “the most affordable self‑pay price to date in a GLP‑1 for obesity,” but provides no universal reimbursement guarantee [7]. Third‑party payer summaries and program listings (e.g., Prime Therapeutics citing TrumpRx pricing) indicate self‑pay prices for established injectables like Wegovy and Ozempic around $350/month and projected orforglipron prices in the same ballpark (~$346/month), with some limited promotional initial‑dose pricing as low as $150/month via certain programs [10]. Analysts expect competition between oral rivals and new multi‑agonist injectables to pressure list prices or create differentiated access programs, but that outcome depends on insurance coverage decisions, manufacturer discounts, and whether payers treat these drugs as chronic obesity therapies versus specialty medicines [9] [4].

4. What to watch next — realities and caveats behind approval and price claims

Regulatory calendars are tight: although the Wegovy pill is approved and orforglipron’s priority review suggests a near‑term decision, neither broader insurance coverage nor out‑of‑pocket cost structures are settled publicly, and company claims about “most affordable” pricing reflect marketing strategies rather than confirmed payer contracts [7] [10]. Multi‑agonists promise higher efficacy but historically bring higher list prices and more complex prior‑authorization pathways; market analysts flag an intense 2026 rollout phase where manufacturer pricing, rebates, and policy responses will determine real‑world affordability [4] [9]. Reporting reviewed does not include comprehensive insurer formularies or final wholesale acquisition costs, so any definitive statement about long‑term patient cost differences would exceed the available sources; what is clear is that oral entrants lower some barriers (needles, refrigeration) while pricing and coverage remain the decisive factors for access [5] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
How do insurers plan to cover oral GLP‑1 pills versus injectable GLP‑1s for obesity?
What clinical data compare efficacy and safety of multi‑agonist therapies (CagriSema, retatrutide) to current GLP‑1 injectables?
How have manufacturer patient‑assistance programs and discount initiatives affected out‑of‑pocket costs for GLP‑1 users?