What nomograms or percentile charts have clinicians developed for penile length and how are they constructed?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A series of clinician-led nomograms and percentile charts—most notably a large systematic review by Veale et al. and several region- or age-specific studies—have been published to place individual penile measurements in population context and to support clinical counselling and research [1][2]. These tools are produced by pooling measured data, calculating central tendency and dispersion, and then generating smoothed percentile curves or simulated distributions to create lookup charts clinicians can use at the bedside [1][3].
1. Who has developed nomograms and percentile charts for penile length
The most-cited adult nomogram comes from Veale and colleagues, who synthesized up to 15,521 medically measured men to create nomograms for flaccid and erect length and circumference [1][2]. Smaller single-cohort nomograms have been produced in specific populations, for example an erect-penis nomogram published from a Middle Eastern cohort referenced in subsequent reviews [4]. More recent region-specific charts include the first comprehensive adult nomogram for Chinese men developed in 2024, which compared Chinese samples to global references [5][6]. Pediatric and adolescent percentile charts have been produced separately for children—large cross-sectional studies in Chongqing (China), Japan and Egypt developed age-specific growth curves for stretched or erect penile length using formal percentile-smoothing techniques [3][7][8].
2. How adult nomograms are constructed: pooling, weighting and simulation
Veale’s systematic approach required inclusion only of studies where health professionals measured penile size with standard methods and excluded samples with congenital or acquired penile abnormalities, prior surgery, or erectile-dysfunction complaints; they then calculated weighted means and a pooled standard deviation across studies as the statistical basis for the nomogram [1][9]. From those pooled parameters they simulated 20,000 observations from a normal distribution to generate continuous nomogram curves and percentiles, a technique that lets clinicians map a single measured value to a percentile in the reference distribution [1][10]. Meta-analyses that underpin some nomograms produced means and standard errors for flaccid, stretched and erect lengths and circumferences which feed into the charts (e.g., erect mean ~13.8 cm) [11].
3. How pediatric percentile charts are constructed: age, smoothing and GAMs
Growth charts for children and adolescents use different methods because size changes with age and puberty; these studies measured penile length with standardized rulers or pachymeters and generated age-specific percentiles using smoothing techniques such as generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) to produce smoothed percentile curves (P3, P10, P25, P50, P75, P90, P97) across age bands [3][12]. Those charts present reference percentiles for stretched or erect penile length by exact age, permitting assessment of development relative to peers—important because adolescents of the same chronological age can be at widely different stages of sexual development [3].
4. Representative numbers and clinical examples from the nomograms
Meta-analytic pooling yields typical central values used in nomograms: pooled flaccid length around 9.2 cm, stretched length about 12.8 cm, and erect length about 13.8 cm in global analyses, with corresponding circumference values reported separately [11]. The nomograms translate these distributions into percentiles: for example, public reporting of the Veale nomogram noted that an erect length of 11 cm corresponds roughly to the 10th percentile while 15 cm is around the 85th percentile—illustrating how the charts emphasize limited variability across much of the distribution [13].
5. Limitations, biases and appropriate uses of penile nomograms
All nomograms are only as reliable as their underlying samples and measurement standards: heterogeneity across studies, ethnic/regional variation, measurement technique (flaccid vs stretched vs erect), and exclusion criteria introduce bias and limit universal applicability [11][1]. Pediatric charts must account for pubertal stage as well as age [3]. Authors and reviewers explicitly position nomograms as clinical counselling tools and research instruments—useful for setting expectations, screening for micropenis definitions, or evaluating outcomes of interventions—but warn against overgeneralizing a single chart to all populations [1][10]. Recent region-specific nomograms (e.g., China) respond to that precise limitation by providing local reference distributions [5][6].
6. Bottom line for clinicians and researchers
Clinicians seeking reference tools can use Veale’s pooled nomograms for broad adult context, consult region-specific adult nomograms where available (e.g., China), and use age-specific pediatric percentiles based on GAMLSS-type smoothing for children and adolescents; all such references require attention to measurement method and population match before applying percentiles in counselling or diagnostic decisions [1][3][5].