How does a penis of 14 centimeter in circumference and 14 centimeter in length compare to the average penis?

1. How the numbers line up with large clinical reviews

The most-cited clinical synthesis, a 2015 systematic review that pooled clinician-measured data, reported mean erect length around 13.12 cm and mean erect circumference about 11.66 cm, which positions a 14 cm length about 0.9 cm above that length average and a 14 cm circumference roughly 2.3 cm above that girth average ^[1]. Other reputable summaries and medical societies repeat similar central values—SMSNA notes average erect length about 5.1 inches (≈13 cm) and circumference about 4.5 inches (≈11.4 cm), corroborating that 14 cm length is slightly above and 14 cm circumference is appreciably above typical figures ^[4].

2. Regional studies and alternate averages that shift the baseline

Not all large datasets agree exactly: some meta-analyses and regional studies report mean erect lengths nearer 13.8–15.2 cm and erect circumferences near 11.9–12.7 cm, meaning the same 14/14 measurement can be close to average in some samples (for example, an American estimate used in a 3D-model preference study placed mean length at 15.2 cm and circumference at 12.7 cm) ^{[2] [3]}. These differences reflect study selection, measurement protocols and population composition, so 14 cm length is either at or slightly above most centroids depending on which dataset is the reference ^[3].

3. Measurement method matters — what "average" really means

Comparisons depend on how measurements were taken: clinician-measured erect length (pubic bone to tip, compressing fat pad) and shaft circumference at base or mid-shaft produce lower, more consistent averages than self-reported measures, which tend to be larger due to bias ^{[5] [1]}. Many meta-analyses explicitly prefer clinician-measured values to reduce volunteer and self-report inflation, and those clinician-centered averages are the ones that place typical erect length near 13 cm and circumference near 11–12 cm ^{[1] [5]}.

4. Where 14/14 sits in the population distribution and functional context

Population distributions are broad: modeled ranges used in preference studies spanned roughly 10–21.6 cm for length and 6.4–17.7 cm for circumference, so 14 cm by 14 cm falls well within commonly observed limits and is not rare or pathological ^[2]. Clinical definitions of micropenis refer to much smaller sizes (erect or stretched lengths far below these numbers), so 14/14 is not in any clinical “small” category reported in the literature ^[6]. Functionally and socially, many researchers emphasize that partner satisfaction depends on many factors beyond raw size, and some surveys find a majority of women rate penis size as unimportant or only modestly important ^{[4] [2]}.

5. Caveats, uncertainties and what the sources reveal about interpretation

Published estimates vary by region, sampling, and measurement technique; meta-analyses warn of publication and volunteer biases that can nudge averages up or down, and some papers report modest regional differences though overall variation between regions may be smaller than popularly believed ^{[3] [1]}. The provided sources do not permit precise percentiles for a 14/14 erect measurement in every population, only that it is within typical ranges and above many reported means ^{[3] [2]}.

6. Bottom line, with alternative perspectives noted

Viewed against clinician-measured international and clinical averages, a 14 cm erect length is marginally above the common mean (≈13–14 cm) while a 14 cm erect circumference is clearly larger than most reported means (≈11.7–12.7 cm), placing this size as “slightly longer than average and above-average girth” within the reported distributions; nonetheless, individual measurement methods and regional datasets can shift that framing slightly, and size alone is not the sole determinant of sexual or psychological outcomes according to the cited literature ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.