Fact check: If my penis is 15 cm erect at the age of 14, about how long will it be when flaccid and is this size normal?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the medical research provided, an erect penis length of 15 cm at age 14 is above average but within normal range. The data shows that the mean stretched penile length for 14-year-old boys is approximately 8.20 cm ^[1], while global studies indicate the average adult erect length ranges from 13.84-13.93 cm ^{[2] [3]}.

Regarding flaccid length, the research indicates that flaccid length typically ranges from 6.1-14 cm (2.4-5.5 inches) for 14-year-old boys ^[4]. Since erect length is typically several centimeters longer than flaccid length, and considering the individual's erect length of 15 cm, the flaccid length would likely fall within or slightly above this normal range.

The size described is normal and healthy - while above the average for the age group, it falls within documented normal variations. One Italian study found mean adult erect length to be 16.78 cm ^[5], suggesting continued growth potential.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several important contextual factors:

• Individual variation is significant - penis size varies considerably across geographical regions and populations ^[3]
• Growth continues beyond age 14 - penile development typically continues through adolescence, with studies showing "catch-up growth" potential ^[6]
• Height correlation exists - research demonstrates that height is proportional to penis length in both flaccid and erect states ^[5]
• Measurement methodology matters - stretched penile length correlates more closely with erectile length than relaxed penile length ^[7]
• Global trends show increasing sizes - average erect penile length has increased over the past three decades worldwide ^[2]

The question focuses solely on numerical measurements without considering the normal developmental process and individual variation that characterizes adolescent growth.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains no apparent misinformation or bias - it's a straightforward medical inquiry seeking factual information about normal development. However, the framing suggests potential anxiety about normalcy that may be unnecessary given that the described measurements fall within healthy ranges.

The question appropriately seeks evidence-based information rather than relying on potentially unreliable sources, which is the correct approach for health-related concerns. The medical literature consistently supports that significant variation in penis size is normal and that development continues well beyond age 14.