What specific holistic healing claims has Pete Sulack made and where were they published?

Checked on January 1, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Dr. Pete Sulack markets a suite of faith‑framed holistic therapies and products that he claims can “save and transform lives,” help people “heal from substantial health issues or avoid them altogether,” and restore optimal bodily function through “functional, metabolic, and holistic protocols”; those claims appear on his personal website and affiliated profiles and interviews where he promotes an 8‑month Be Resilient program and the Redeem Essentials supplement line [1] [2] [3]. An Authority Magazine / Medium interview amplifies the narrative that he used those protocols to survive an otherwise terminal Grade 4 diffuse astrocytoma, and that his supplements support metabolic and mitochondrial function and inflammation reduction [4].

1. What Sulack explicitly claims on his own website

Dr. Sulack’s homepage and About page present explicit healing claims tied to named programs and products: the Be Resilient program is described as having been “created to save and transform lives” and to enable people to “heal from substantial health issues or avoid them altogether” by using “proper protocols” so “the body can function optimally,” language that frames recovery and prevention as program outcomes [1]. The same site promotes Redeem Essentials as a supplement line “personally developed by Dr. Pete,” listing the products as tools he “personally uses and recommends” to his followers and patients [1] [2].

2. Specific therapeutic targets and mechanisms Sulack cites

Across his public materials Sulack emphasizes metabolic, mitochondrial, detoxification and inflammation‑reduction goals for his supplements and protocols: Redeem Essentials is described as supporting “metabolic health, mitochondrial function, detox pathways, and inflammation reduction,” while his broader approach is labeled “functional, metabolic, and holistic” care—phrasing that suggests specific physiological mechanisms are the intended routes to healing [4] [1]. His clinic and virtual program are presented as comprehensive, personalized interventions intended especially for people “facing cancer and chronic illness” [4] [1].

3. Where these claims were published and amplified

The primary publication venues for these claims are Sulack’s own website (drpetesulack.com), including a full About page that details his programs and products [2] [1], a provider profile on Progressive Medical Center that repeats his narrative and the use of “functional, metabolic, and holistic protocols” [3], and an Authority Magazine interview hosted on Medium that frames Sulack as a cancer survivor and explicitly links his recovery to the protocols and the Redeem Essentials product line while describing the Be Resilient program as an “8‑month personalized health transformation” for cancer patients and the chronically ill [4].

4. Commercial context and potential conflicts of interest

Sulack’s publications double as marketing: his site describes Redeem Essentials as a supplement company he founded and the Be Resilient program as a virtual product, and repeatedly notes he developed and uses the supplements himself—statements that disclose, implicitly, a commercial interest in promoting these outcomes [1] [2]. The Medium/Authority Magazine profile functions as both storytelling and promotion, presenting an anecdotal survival narrative that supports enrollment in his paid program and product purchases [4].

5. Limits of the reporting and alternative viewpoints

The available sources outline claims and goals but do not supply third‑party clinical evidence, peer‑reviewed studies, or regulatory approvals substantiating that the programs or supplements cause cancer remission or reliably cure chronic illnesses; those evidentiary gaps are not filled in the cited materials [1] [4]. Independent medical or scientific evaluations are not present in the supplied reporting, and other viewpoints—such as oncologists’ assessments of Grade 4 diffuse astrocytoma prognosis or randomized trial data on the specific supplements—are not included in these sources, so the claims must be understood as promoted by Sulack and echoed by affiliated profiles rather than independently validated [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What peer‑reviewed studies exist on supplements that claim to improve mitochondrial function in cancer patients?
How are patient outcomes and safety regulated for online functional medicine programs and direct‑to‑consumer supplement lines?
What is the standard prognosis and evidence‑based treatment for Grade 4 diffuse astrocytoma according to oncology guidelines?