What is the average penis size preferred by women in their 20s?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Most published studies find women’s preferred erect penis size only slightly exceeds average male measurements: the 3D‑model study that’s widely cited reported mean preferred erect lengths of 6.3 inches for long‑term partners and 6.4 inches for one‑time partners, with girths about 4.8–5.0 inches [1] — roughly 1.0–1.3 inches longer than many estimates of average erect length (about 5.1–5.5 inches) reported in medical reviews [2]. Smaller, newer or commercially run surveys sometimes report different “ideal” numbers (for example, 5.5 inches in one report and higher figures in industry surveys), showing that method and sample matter [3] [4].
1. How the most-cited academic study measured preference — and what it actually found
A controlled laboratory study used 3D‑printed, lifelike penis models and asked sexually experienced women to choose preferred sizes for short‑term and long‑term partners; results showed women preferred an erect length of 6.4 inches and girth of 5.0 inches for one‑time partners, and 6.3 inches length and 4.8 inches girth for long‑term partners — described by the authors as “only slightly larger than the average” [1]. The paper emphasizes the small difference between preferred size and measured averages and reports women recalled model sizes reliably [5] [1].
2. What “average” erect size means in medical literature
Medical reviews collating multiple measurement studies place typical erect length around 5.1–5.5 inches (about 12.9–13.9 cm), with girth estimates near 4.6–4.9 inches; these averages come from pooled and physician‑measured studies and are cited by health outlets summarizing the literature [2] [3]. The academic preferred sizes above therefore sit roughly 1.0–1.3 inches longer than those averages [1] [2].
3. Why different studies and polls produce different “ideal” numbers
Methodology drives variation. The academic 3D‑model study used tactile, standardized stimuli and a modest, demographically limited sample (mostly California residents) [5] [1]. Other reports — including media summaries, private surveys, and clinic marketing — use online polls, larger but self‑selected samples, or commercial scales; these can return lower (e.g., 5.5 inches) or higher (e.g., reports claiming 7+ inches) preferred sizes depending on question framing and the vendor’s agenda [3] [4]. Sources such as Moorgate Andrology published headline‑grabbing claims (7.5 inches) tied to promoting procedures, which signals a potential commercial motive [4].
4. What women say about importance, beyond raw inches
Multiple sources report most women place limited emphasis on size relative to technique, intimacy, and partner responsiveness; many surveys find a large majority satisfied with their partners’ size and that girth can matter as much as length [6] [7] [8]. The 3D‑model research itself frames preferred sizes as only slightly above average and notes that relationship context (one‑time vs. long‑term) influences choices [1] [5].
5. Limitations and gaps in reporting you should know
Available sources show variation by sample, measurement method and commercial interest: the 3D study sample was not nationally representative and other surveys rely on self‑report or clinic promotion [5] [4]. Medical reviews caution that “average” estimates vary with measurement technique and that men tend to misreport size, complicating comparisons [2] [8]. Available sources do not mention a definitive, nationally representative survey of women in their 20s alone reporting a unique “average preferred” figure specific to that age group — age‑segmented preference data are not found in current reporting (not found in current reporting).
6. How to interpret the numbers practically
Treat the commonly cited figures — ~6.3–6.4 inches preferred and ~5.1–5.5 inches average erect — as approximations shaped by study method [1] [2]. The strongest evidence (3D models) shows preference only modestly above average and context‑dependent; commercial claims that prime preference is much larger should be weighed against likely marketing incentives [4]. Multiple sources emphasize sexual satisfaction depends far more on communication, technique and compatibility than a single measurement [6] [3].
Sources cited: Prause et al. 3D‑model study and PubMed summary [5] [1]; Medical News Today review of average size [2]; Ro and Hims writeups and media summaries [6] [9] [3]; Moorgate/clinic coverage signaling commercial motives [4]; contextual summaries on satisfaction and averages [7] [8].