How does pregabalin’s side-effect profile compare with cholinesterase inhibitors for older adults?

Checked on January 7, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Pregabalin and cholinesterase inhibitors produce distinct adverse-effect patterns in older adults: pregabalin primarily causes central nervous system effects (dizziness, somnolence) and has been associated with peripheral edema and a signal for increased heart‑failure risk, especially in those with existing cardiovascular disease [1] [2] [3], whereas cholinesterase inhibitors cause predictable cholinergic peripheral and cardiac effects (nausea, diarrhea, increased secretions, bradycardia, syncope) and carry psychiatric and interaction risks in dementia patients [4] [5] [6] [7]. Direct head‑to‑head comparative trials in older adults are not provided in the reviewed sources, so conclusions must rely on assembling adverse‑event profiles and population signals from separate studies [1] [4] [2].

1. How the drugs work — and why their side effects aren’t the same

Pregabalin is a gabapentinoid that modulates α2δ subunits of voltage‑gated calcium channels and reduces neurotransmitter release, producing CNS depressant effects and fluid retention mechanisms linked to peripheral edema, whereas cholinesterase inhibitors boost acetylcholine by blocking its degradation and therefore produce muscarinic and nicotinic overstimulation across peripheral and central systems [1] [2] [4] [5]. These mechanistic differences explain why pregabalin’s principal problems are sedation, dizziness and volume‑related cardiovascular signals, while cholinesterase inhibitors classically yield gastrointestinal, secretory and bradyarrhythmic adverse events [1] [4] [5].

2. Pregabalin in older adults — common adverse effects and emerging cardiovascular concerns

Clinical pooled analyses of older patients treated for neuropathic pain identify dizziness and somnolence as the most frequent adverse events and stress dose‑titration and renal adjustment to reduce risk in the elderly [1], while observational cohort signals from Medicare data and summaries report higher rates of peripheral edema and an increased incidence of heart failure with pregabalin compared with gabapentin in adults aged 65–89, with greater absolute risk among patients with pre‑existing cardiovascular disease [2] [3]. Additional sources note older adults may be more susceptible to cognitive side effects from pregabalin, and reduced renal clearance with aging can raise pregabalin exposure, amplifying these risks [8] [9].

3. Cholinesterase inhibitors in older adults — predictable cholinergic harms and cardiac/psychiatric risks

Randomized trials and reviews consistently report that roughly one‑third of participants experience side effects from cholinesterase inhibitors, principally nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and anorexia, and that the agents are associated with bradycardia, syncope, an elevated need for pacemaker insertion and increased hip‑fracture risk in community‑dwelling older adults [4] [10] [5]. Systematic review work also documents psychiatric adverse events (agitation, anxiety, mood changes) in Alzheimer’s and Parkinsonian dementias, and clinicians warn of adverse cardiovascular interactions when cholinesterase inhibitors are combined with beta‑blockers, calcium‑channel blockers or antiarrhythmics [6] [7].

4. Interactions, prescribing cascades and population vulnerabilities

A notable clinical problem with cholinesterase inhibitors is the potential for prescribing cascades: clinicians may misinterpret cholinergic adverse effects and add anticholinergic drugs or other treatments, worsening outcomes; concomitant anticholinergic medications blunt efficacy and increase cognitive and functional decline in dementia patients [11] [12]. Pregabalin’s vulnerability lies in pharmacokinetic changes with age (reduced renal clearance) and polypharmacy that raises fall and sedation risk; the cardiovascular signal for heart failure further amplifies concern in patients with cardiac comorbidity [9] [1] [2].

5. Putting it together — comparative practical risks for clinicians and caregivers

For an older adult without dementia but with chronic neuropathic pain, pregabalin’s dominant harms are sedation, dizziness and edema with a measurable heart‑failure risk signal—making falls and decompensated heart disease the chief concerns [1] [2] [3]; for an older adult with dementia, cholinesterase inhibitors pose gastrointestinal distress, increased secretions, bradycardia and syncope and can precipitate psychiatric changes and harmful drug interactions, so monitoring for cognitive and cardiac adverse events is critical [4] [5] [6] [7]. Because the literature reviewed does not present randomized head‑to‑head safety trials of these classes in the same populations, clinicians must weigh individualized risks (cardiac disease, renal function, dementia status, concomitant meds) rather than assume one class is universally safer [1] [4] [2].

6. Clinical implications — monitoring, dose adjustment and deprescribing where appropriate

Best practice from the sources is cautious dosing and slow titration of pregabalin with renal adjustment and vigilance for dizziness, somnolence, edema and signs of heart failure in older patients [1] [9] [2], while cholinesterase inhibitor use mandates routine follow‑up for gastrointestinal effects, monitoring pulse and blood pressure for bradycardia/syncope, and active review of anticholinergic co‑medication to avoid prescribing cascades and diminished efficacy [4] [5] [12] [11]. When evidence gaps exist—particularly direct comparative safety in overlapping older populations—shared decision‑making and regular medication review remain essential [1] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What monitoring strategies reduce pregabalin‑related falls and heart‑failure risk in older adults?
How does anticholinergic burden influence outcomes in dementia patients taking cholinesterase inhibitors?
Are there randomized trials comparing cognitive and safety outcomes of pregabalin versus alternative neuropathic pain treatments in adults over 65?