Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Projected cost increases for health insurance without ACA subsidy extension
Executive Summary
The core claim across analyses is that letting the enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) premium tax credits expire would sharply increase marketplace premiums and out-of-pocket premium payments for many enrollees, with headline estimates ranging from roughly a doubling (about 114%) of average subsidized premium payments to larger, more varied spikes for specific households, and broader estimates of increased uninsured counts over time [1] [2] [3]. Analysts differ on magnitude and distribution: nonpartisan health policy groups and news reports emphasize a clear and substantial premium shock for current subsidy recipients and possibly millions becoming uninsured, while other summaries show more moderate average premium projections or focus on state and income heterogeneity [4] [5] [6].
1. Clear claims: premium doubling and who pays the price
Multiple sources present a consistent headline: average premium payments for subsidized enrollees would more than double if the enhanced premium tax credits lapse, rising from an average of about $888 in 2025 to roughly $1,904 in 2026—an increase of about 114 percent and about $1,016 annually per enrollee [1] [2]. Other analyses state that pre-subsidy premiums could rise roughly 26 percent on average, while post-subsidy costs for households would spike, with the heaviest burden placed on those above 400 percent of the federal poverty level who lose eligibility for subsidies and thus would face full premium responsibility [4] [7]. These are presented as national averages; the distributional reality varies widely by age, geography, and plan choice.
2. Divergent estimates and examples: averages mask extremes
Although the average doubling is the most-cited figure, several analyses highlight much larger spikes for specific households, including examples of premiums increasing by 300 percent or more and some families facing several-thousand-dollar or even $20,000-plus increases in annual premium bills, underscoring how averages can obscure extreme cases [8] [7]. At the same time, other estimates suggest a 75 percent average rise in some projections and emphasize that up to 22 million people who received premium tax credits in 2025 could be affected by higher nominal premiums even if not all lose coverage [3] [6]. Methodological differences—which baseline premiums are measured, whether figures reflect pre- or post-subsidy amounts, and assumptions about plan availability—explain much of the variation.
3. Coverage and uninsured projections: millions at stake
Analysts cite the Congressional Budget Office and nonpartisan researchers to argue that expiration of enhanced subsidies would likely reduce subsidized enrollment and increase the uninsured rate, with one multi-source projection estimating up to 4 million additional uninsured people over the next decade, concentrated among marketplace-eligible adults and in non-Medicaid-expansion states [5] [6] [7]. The mechanism is straightforward: as net premiums rise sharply, cost-sensitive households either switch to narrow networks, buy lower-tier plans, or forgo insurance entirely. Federal spending would fall if subsidies end, but advocates warn the fiscal savings could be accompanied by worse access and higher uncompensated care costs borne by states and providers.
4. Who bears the brunt: age, income, and state differences
The impacts are unequal. Analyses consistently flag older adults and those just above subsidy-eligibility cutoffs as especially vulnerable: older enrollees face higher premium loads under age-rated pricing, and households above 400% of the poverty threshold would suddenly be charged full premiums, often making coverage unaffordable [6] [4]. Geographic variation matters: states that did not expand Medicaid or have less competitive marketplaces may see steeper premium increases and fewer plan options, amplifying harm. Policy design choices—whether subsidies are extended at full enhanced rates, tapered, or targeted by income—determine how sharply different groups are affected.
5. Uncertainties, methodological caveats, and policy trade-offs
Key uncertainties drive divergent figures: analysts use different baselines (pre- versus post-subsidy premiums), distinct modeling assumptions about insurer pricing responses, and varying timelines for behavioral change among enrollees and insurers. Some reports stress that federal savings from subsidy expiration would be offset to uncertain degrees by higher state and private sector costs, and that short-term sticker shock could prompt policy responses or market adjustments. Advocacy and political agendas shape emphasis—budget-focused organizations highlight fiscal savings and enrollment shifts [5], while health-policy and consumer-focused outlets emphasize uninsured risks and household hardship [1] [8]. The different emphases reflect distinct priorities but rest on the same core finding: subsidy expiration would materially raise consumer premiums and risk higher uninsured rates.