Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there proposed changes to ACA contribution percentages in 2025?
Executive Summary
Congressional and administrative actions have produced two related but distinct developments for 2025: the IRS has set the ACA employer “affordability” contribution percentage for plan-year 2025 at 9.02%, changing employer liability and affordability safe harbors, while separate federal premium tax credit expansions that affect Marketplace enrollee contributions are temporary and subject to expiration or extension, creating uncertainty about household costs after 2025. Both sets of numbers matter, but they apply to different populations and legal programs and have different legislative timelines and budgetary implications [1] [2] [3].
1. What the IRS rule actually changes — employers face a higher affordability bar in 2025
The Internal Revenue Service published guidance raising the ACA employer-sponsored coverage affordability percentage to 9.02% of household income for the 2025 plan year, up from 8.39% in 2024; this figure determines whether employer coverage is considered unaffordable for the Employer Mandate and whether employees can claim Marketplace premium tax credits instead [1]. That administrative percentage affects how employers calculate employee cost-sharing safe harbors and potential shared-responsibility payments. The IRS guidance also translates into concrete monthly safe-harbor numbers for employee-only coverage, establishing an operational threshold employers can use to demonstrate compliance and avoid penalties [4]. This is a finalized administrative figure for employer plan administration rather than a congressional reworking of Marketplace subsidy law [1] [4].
2. What consumers on the Marketplace should watch — premium tax credit expansions are temporary
Separately, Congress enacted enhanced Premium Tax Credits in recent years that reduced household required contributions for Marketplace coverage and expanded eligibility; many analyses flag that these provisions are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025, which would sharply raise the percentage of income families must pay and likely increase unsubsidized premiums for many consumers in 2026 absent further legislative action [5] [2]. Nonpartisan policy groups and health-policy trackers model that Marketplace premium payments could more than double on average if enhanced credits lapse, with significant effects on enrollment, individual finances, and federal spending [2] [6]. Those changes are statutory and hinge on Congressional decisions about extension or replacement, making the post‑2025 landscape contingent on lawmakers’ choices.
3. Why the two numbers are often conflated — different rules, similar language
Media and policy discussions frequently conflate the IRS affordability percentage (employer-focused) with the applicable percentages used to compute Premium Tax Credits (Marketplace-focused) because both use percent-of-income thresholds to determine affordability. The IRS number for employer coverage is an administrative calculation affecting employer liability, while the Applicable Percentages Table that governs premium tax credit share is set by statute and administrative guidance and is scheduled to rise sharply in 2026 if enhanced credits expire [3] [1]. Clarifying that these are separate mechanisms is essential: employer affordability changes do not by themselves alter the statutory subsidy schedule for Marketplace consumers, though both affect household health coverage costs in different populations [3] [1].
4. What each stakeholder should expect — employers, Marketplace enrollees, and policymakers
Employers should plan for a higher affordability threshold in 2025, which may increase the number of employees classified as eligible for premium tax credits and potentially raise employer shared-responsibility exposure unless plan designs adjust the employee premium share per the safe-harbor calculations [1] [4]. Marketplace enrollees face a separate risk: if Congress allows enhanced Premium Tax Credits to lapse after 2025, many households will see their required contributions and overall premiums rise sharply in 2026, which could reduce enrollment and increase uncompensated care burdens [2] [6]. Policymakers must weigh federal budget impacts against coverage and affordability outcomes when considering extensions or new designs for subsidies [6].
5. Timeline and decision points — what happens next and when
The employer affordability percentage for 2025 is already set by IRS guidance and applies to plan-year compliance in 2025, so employers and payroll administrators must act now to implement changes. The enhanced Premium Tax Credits are on a statutory clock through the end of 2025; Congress faces a decision before the 2026 plan year begins to extend, modify, or allow those provisions to expire, and that legislative action (or inaction) will determine the Applicable Percentages Table and consumer costs starting in 2026 [1] [5] [3]. Interest groups and budget analysts are actively modeling alternatives and lobbying for different outcomes, adding political dynamics to what otherwise would be technical timing issues [6].
6. Bottom line for readers — two separate changes with joined consequences
In short, there are administrative changes affecting employer affordability in 2025 that are already in effect and statutory subsidy changes affecting Marketplace household contributions that may expire after 2025 unless Congress intervenes; both will influence who pays what for health coverage, but they operate through different legal mechanisms and on different timelines. Readers should treat the IRS 9.02% figure as a finalized employer rule and track congressional actions on premium tax credits to understand the likely trajectory of consumer out‑of‑pocket costs in 2026 [1] [2] [3].