Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Post Title: The only 4 ingredients proven to work in skincare Post Content: New Scientist reports: “The only four skincare ingredients that have been proven to work: ingredients with the strongest evidence to back up marketing claims…. retinoids, vitamin C, niacinamide and alpha hydroxy acids (AHAs).” https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26435230-900-the-only-four-skincare-ingredients-that-have-been-proven-to-work/ Original Reddit link: https://www.reddit.com/r/AusSkincare/comments/1iulcm2/the_only_4_ingredients_proven_to_work_in_skincare/

Checked on February 22, 2025

1. Summary of the results

While the cited ingredients (retinoids, vitamin C, niacinamide, and AHAs) are indeed scientifically supported skincare ingredients [1], the claim that these are the "only" four ingredients proven to work cannot be fully verified based on the provided analyses. The scientific literature acknowledges these ingredients' effectiveness in improving skin texture, reducing pigmentation, and addressing aging signs [1], but doesn't explicitly confirm they are the only effective ones.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • The analyses don't provide a comprehensive review of all existing skincare ingredients and their efficacy studies
  • Clinical skincare practices involve more than just individual ingredients, focusing on broader skin hygiene and care protocols [2]
  • The statement lacks information about:
    • Concentration levels needed for effectiveness
    • Potential combinations of ingredients
    • Individual skin type considerations
    • Safety profiles of these ingredients

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement contains potentially misleading elements:

  • The use of the word "only" is problematic as it makes an absolute claim that isn't supported by the available analyses
  • This type of absolute statement could benefit:
    • Manufacturers of products containing these specific ingredients
    • Publishers seeking attention-grabbing headlines
    • Marketers looking to simplify complex skincare science

  • The statement oversimplifies skincare science by suggesting that effectiveness can be reduced to just four ingredients, while clinical evidence suggests skincare is more complex and individualized [2]
  • The claim would be more accurate if presented as "four well-studied and proven" ingredients rather than the "only" proven ingredients.

    Want to dive deeper?
    Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
    Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
    Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?