Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials have tested modalities advocated by Pete Sulack (e.g., energy healing, crystal therapy)?
Executive summary
Available reporting on Pete Sulack describes a faith-forward, integrative “resilience” protocol emphasizing diet, supplements, detoxification, oxygenation and spiritual practices; his public materials and interviews list modalities such as infrared saunas, coffee enemas, hyperbaric oxygen, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy and supplement lines but do not present peer‑reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that test the specific combination or many of the individual modalities he advocates (not found in current reporting) [1] [2] [3].
1. Who Pete Sulack says he used and promotes
Pete Sulack’s websites, interviews and podcasts describe a multi‑pillar approach—dietary changes (anti‑inflammatory, low sugar), targeted supplementation (Redeem Essentials), detox practices (infrared sauna, coffee enemes claimed on podcast), oxygenation therapies (hyperbaric chambers) and devices such as pulsed electromagnetic field therapy—framed alongside faith and narrative testimony of his own recovery from grade 4 brain cancer [1] [2] [3].
2. What the provided sources report about clinical evidence for his protocol
The materials collected (site pages, podcasts, interviews) acknowledge clinical trials are needed for some repurposed drugs and interventions in oncology but do not point to completed peer‑reviewed RCTs that validate Sulack’s full “resilience” protocol or that test many of the specific complementary modalities he recommends as a unified treatment for cancer or other diseases [4] [3]. Available sources do not mention peer‑reviewed RCTs of his complete protocol (not found in current reporting).
3. Evidence reported for individual modalities in Sulack’s public discussions
Sulack and interviewers reference specific modalities—infrared saunas, coffee enemas, hyperbaric oxygen, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy and dietary/supplement regimens—presented as parts of his regimen or commonly used in integrative approaches; the provided interviews and podcast summaries describe these as practices he uses or recommends but do not cite RCTs proving their efficacy within his protocol [2] [3].
4. What the current reporting does cite or concede about trials and science
In at least one interview about repurposed drugs, Sulack is quoted saying “clinical trials still need to be done,” which signals acknowledgement that some steps toward rigorous testing remain outstanding; however, the reporting does not supply trial identifiers, journal citations, or randomized controlled data for his specific methods [4].
5. Where to look next (and why the absence matters)
To assess whether RCTs exist for any single modality Sulack promotes (for example, hyperbaric oxygen in specific oncologic settings, or clinical trials of pulsed electromagnetic fields) one would need to search medical databases and peer‑reviewed journals; the materials provided here (his sites, podcasts, interviews) do not perform that literature check and do not provide RCT citations [1] [2] [3]. The absence of cited trials in his public-facing content is important: testimonials and case narratives are persuasive but are not substitutes for randomized evidence when evaluating safety and efficacy [3].
6. Competing perspectives and potential agendas
Sulack’s messaging consistently combines faith, personal testimony and commercial offerings (Redeem Essentials supplements, Resilience Protocol), an approach that can motivate patients but also aligns with an agenda to promote his products and programs; his interviews and site promote free distribution of his protocol but also sell supplements and services—readers should note this convergence of advocacy and commerce when weighing claims [1] [5]. Independent scientific reviewers and conventional oncology communities typically require RCT evidence before endorsing modalities as cancer treatments; available reporting does not show such independent validation for Sulack’s integrated protocol [4].
7. Bottom line for readers seeking RCT‑level proof
Based on the sources provided, there is no documentation in Sulack’s public materials or interviews of peer‑reviewed randomized controlled trials testing the overall protocol he advocates; if you want an RCT‑level evaluation, you will need searches of clinical trial registries and medical journals because the supplied reporting neither lists nor links to such trials (not found in current reporting) [4] [1] [3].
If you want, I can: (A) search clinical trial registries and PubMed for randomized trials of the specific modalities Sulack mentions (hyperbaric oxygen, PEMF, infrared sauna, coffee enemas, his particular supplement formulations), or (B) compile the primary claims from his 87‑page Resilience Protocol so you can compare them directly to available trial evidence. Which would you prefer?