Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: RFK autism registry
1. Summary of the results
The claim about an "RFK autism registry" appears to be largely unsubstantiated. While there is a partnership between NIH and CMS to collect de-identified data on Medicare and Medicaid enrollees with autism for research purposes, there is no evidence of a comprehensive registry tracking all Americans with autism [1].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original query:
- Autism Statistics: A 2023 federal report showed that only 26.7% of 8-year-olds with autism had "profound" autism, significantly contradicting Kennedy's more severe characterizations [2].
- Diagnostic Evolution: The increase in autism diagnoses is primarily attributed to:
- Broader diagnostic criteria
- Increased awareness
- Improved screening methods
- Better recognition
Rather than an "epidemic" as sometimes claimed [3] [4]
- Scientific Consensus: Multiple rigorous studies have found no connection between vaccines and autism, despite Kennedy's reluctance to acknowledge this during his HHS confirmation hearings [5] [4].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
Several potential sources of bias and misinformation exist:
- Misrepresentation of Autism Spectrum: Kennedy's characterization of autism has been criticized for:
- Being significantly distorted
- Focusing disproportionately on severe cases
- Not representing the full spectrum of autism experiences [2]
- Stakeholder Interests:
- Anti-vaccine advocates benefit from promoting fear about autism registries and surveillance
- Medical researchers and healthcare providers benefit from having access to de-identified data for research purposes
- Autism advocacy groups have expressed concern that Kennedy's statements are potentially harmful to the autism community [4]
- Data Interpretation: Kennedy has been criticized for:
- Selectively interpreting data
- Misrepresenting scientific research
- Making claims not supported by scientific evidence [3] [5]