In 2021, was there a report by CCDH report that found out RFK jr. was part of the dozen that spread 2/3 of all the anti-vaccine mis-information on social media?

Checked on September 24, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

The statement that in 2021, a report by the CCDH found RFK Jr. to be part of a dozen individuals responsible for spreading 2/3 of all anti-vaccine misinformation on social media is largely supported by the analyses provided [1] [2]. These sources confirm that RFK Jr. was indeed named as one of the "disinformation dozen" in a 2021 CCDH report for his role in spreading anti-vaccine misinformation [1]. The report highlights the significant impact of a small group of anti-vaxxers, including RFK Jr., on the dissemination of false information about vaccines on social media platforms [1]. Furthermore, the failure of social media platforms to adequately address the issue by removing accounts that violate their terms of service, such as those of RFK Jr., is also noted [3].

  • Key findings from the analyses include:
  • The CCDH report identified a small group of individuals, including RFK Jr., as responsible for a large portion of anti-vaccine content [1].
  • Social media platforms have been criticized for not removing anti-vaccine accounts, despite violations of their terms [3].
  • RFK Jr. was specifically named as part of the "disinformation dozen" for spreading anti-vaccine falsehoods [1] [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

While the analyses provided largely support the claim, there are alternative viewpoints and missing contexts that could offer a more nuanced understanding of the issue. For instance, the analysis from "[4]" discusses the spread of anti-vaccine misinformation on social media and the importance of addressing it but does not provide direct evidence for the claim [4]. Additionally, "[5]" mentions RFK Jr.'s involvement in spreading misinformation about COVID vaccines but does not directly support or contradict the claim about the CCDH report [5].

  • Missing contexts include:
  • The broader societal factors contributing to the spread of anti-vaccine misinformation (not directly addressed in the provided analyses).
  • The specific actions taken by social media platforms in response to the CCDH report and the impact of those actions (not detailed in the analyses).

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be subject to potential misinformation or bias as it simplifies the complex issue of anti-vaccine misinformation on social media to a single report and a dozen individuals, including RFK Jr. [1] [2]. While the CCDH report and other analyses do support the significant role of these individuals in spreading misinformation, the framing of the issue might overlook the broader structural and societal factors that contribute to the dissemination and acceptance of false information about vaccines [4].

  • Potential biases or misinformation include:
  • Overemphasis on individual actors rather than systemic issues [1].
  • Lack of discussion on the effectiveness of current measures to combat anti-vaccine misinformation and the challenges faced by social media platforms in this regard [3].
Want to dive deeper?
What were the findings of the CCDH report on anti-vaccine misinformation in 2021?
How did RFK Jr respond to the CCDH report on his role in spreading anti-vaccine misinformation?
What social media platforms were most affected by RFK Jr's anti-vaccine misinformation campaign?
What are the consequences of spreading anti-vaccine misinformation on social media?
How does RFK Jr's anti-vaccine stance compare to scientific consensus on vaccine safety?