Where can I find Rosabella Moringa’s official Supplement Facts panel or third‑party Certificate of Analysis (COA)?

Checked on January 13, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Rosabella’s product pages on its official site present ingredient and marketing claims for Rosabella Moringa and sell the capsules exclusively through that site (tryrosabella.com) [1] [2] [3]; independent write‑ups and crowd‑submitted databases reproduce a Supplement Facts‑style label and ingredient listing (showing “Moringa oleifera (leaf)” and serving size statements) but a publicly posted, downloadable Certificate of Analysis (COA) hosted by the company is not clearly visible in the supplied reporting [4] [5] [6] [7].

1. Where the official Supplement Facts panel appears in available reporting

The company’s product pages (Rosabella Moringa Powder Capsules and related product listings) are the primary official source referenced in the reporting and include the marketing claims and ingredient statements used to describe the product on retail pages [1] [2] [3]; third‑party reviewers and databases have copied a Supplement Facts‑style label that lists the active ingredient as Horseradish Tree (Moringa oleifera) (leaf) and a serving size implying 800 mg per serving (two veggie capsules) in the cases documented [4] [5].

2. Independent reproductions and community entries that duplicate the label

A PhD farmer’s deep‑dive review reproduces the Supplement Facts details — stating the label shows “Horseradish Tree (Moringa) (moringa oleifera)(leaf),” with a serving of two veggie capsules delivering 800 mg of moringa leaf and “Other Ingredients” limited to hypromellose (vegetable capsule) — and endorses that transparency [4]. Open Food Facts, a crowd‑sourced product database, also lists the same ingredient line and capsule material, reinforcing that the published label information is circulating beyond the brand’s own pages [5].

3. Claims about third‑party testing and COAs in the coverage

Some retailer pages and a comparative review assert that Rosabella provides certificates of analysis and that the product is third‑party tested for heavy metals and purity; for example, a comparative review claims “Rosabella provides Certificates of Analysis for every batch, testing for heavy metals” and multiple product listings say the item is “3rd party tested for quality and purity” [7] [6]. These are reported claims by reviewers and resellers rather than a reproduced COA document in the provided sources.

4. What the reporting does not show (and why that matters)

None of the supplied snippets reproduce or link to an explicit, downloadable COA hosted on the brand’s site or a laboratory’s portal; the materials show product pages, reproduced Supplement Facts text, and reviewer statements about COAs but do not include a visible COA PDF or lab report in the excerpts provided [1] [2] [4] [7] [6]. Because a COA is the verifiable laboratory record users usually seek, the absence of an actual COA file in these sources is a meaningful gap in the documentation available here (p1_s1–p1_s8).

5. Practical next steps based on the available evidence

The most direct place to find the official Supplement Facts panel is the Rosabella product pages on tryrosabella.com, which serve as the brand’s primary retail and informational hub in the reporting [1] [2] [3], and independent reviews and Open Food Facts reflect that label information [4] [5]. For a batch‑specific COA, the reporting only shows claims that COAs exist (via reviews and reseller copy) rather than the COAs themselves [7] [6]; therefore, a reasonable verification route—consistent with industry practice though not documented in these sources—would be to request the COA directly from Rosabella’s customer service or look for a COA link on the product page if present when viewed in full. The supplied reporting does not include a direct COA link or PDF, so this recommendation is offered in light of that absence (p1_s1–[1]0).

6. Reader caveat and alternative verification channels

Where independent testers or retailers state that third‑party testing exists, those are useful signals but should be corroborated with an actual lab report or COA that lists tests (e.g., heavy metals, microbial limits, identity) and batch numbers; the sources here show claims of third‑party testing but do not reproduce laboratory data, so the claim stands as reported by reviewers and sellers rather than independently documented COAs within this corpus [7] [6]. If a downloadable COA cannot be produced, consumers commonly ask for a scanned COA tied to the bottle lot number or seek testing summaries from accredited labs — steps that are not detailed in the reporting provided (p1_s1–[1]0).

Want to dive deeper?
How can consumers verify a supplement's COA and what should a COA include?
Are there independent lab results or regulatory actions related to moringa supplements generally?
What red flags indicate a supplement COA might be forged or incomplete?