Has Dr. Sanjay Gupta ever endorsed or criticized Neurocept in medical journals?

1. What the reporting says: no journal endorsement found, deepfakes alleged

Investigative coverage of Neurocept advertisements concludes the product is promoted through deceptive marketing and uses deepfaked footage of high‑profile figures — including Dr. Sanjay Gupta — to imply endorsements that do not exist; the Ibisik piece states plainly there is “no endorsement from Dr. Sanjay Gupta” and labels the Neurocept campaign a scam propped up by deepfake ads ^[1]. CNN’s reporting complements that finding by publishing Gupta’s own reaction: he denounced the use of AI to create fake product ads that misuse his likeness ^[2].

2. What Gupta himself said in the reporting

CNN quotes Dr. Sanjay Gupta directly as objecting to scammers’ use of his image and voice in AI‑generated or doctored ads selling bogus health cures and products, framing the misuse as a widespread problem and distancing himself from any claims made in such commercials ^[2]. That public denunciation functions as an explicit repudiation of any implied endorsement, at least in the context of these fake ads ^[2].

3. Where the sources are specific — and where they are silent

The available sources are specific about two points: (a) Neurocept’s marketing includes a “honey recipe” pitch and other sensational claims, and (b) the ads allegedly use doctored images and deepfakes of trusted figures like Gupta to sell pills ^{[1] [2]}. The sources do not provide any evidence of Dr. Gupta publishing an endorsement or critique of Neurocept in peer‑reviewed medical journals; they state the opposite — that there is no endorsement — and report his public denouncement of AI misuse ^{[1] [2]}. Available sources do not mention any medical‑journal article by Gupta addressing Neurocept.

4. How to interpret “endorsement” vs. “misuse of likeness”

Journal endorsements and public statements are different: an endorsement in a medical journal would be a documented, citable action by Dr. Gupta in the published literature. The reporting shows only that scammers used his likeness in promotional videos and that he publicly condemned that misuse, which is not the same as a journal‑published endorsement or critique ^{[1] [2]}. The Ibisik investigation explicitly frames the appearance of Gupta in ads as part of the scam’s tactic to “borrow trust” from respected figures rather than reflecting legitimate scientific support ^[1].

5. Competing perspectives and potential agendas

Ibisik’s article is framed as an exposé of a scam and takes a strong position that Neurocept is fraudulent and uses deepfakes ^[1]. CNN’s piece centers on Gupta’s denunciation of AI‑created fake ads — it focuses on the problem of likeness misuse rather than on the product’s clinical claims ^[2]. Readers should note the differing agendas: Ibisik aims to debunk a product and may rely on investigative assertions, while CNN relays Gupta’s firsthand reaction and broader concerns about AI misuse in health advertising ^{[1] [2]}.

6. Practical takeaway and what remains unproven

Based on the cited reporting, you should treat claims that Dr. Sanjay Gupta has endorsed Neurocept as unsupported and likely false; the published pieces say there is no endorsement and that his likeness was used without consent in deceptive ads ^{[1] [2]}. However, these sources do not present evidence about documents beyond these news reports — available sources do not mention any peer‑reviewed medical‑journal endorsement or published critique by Gupta regarding Neurocept, so that specific absence is reported but not exhaustively proven ^{[1] [2]}.

7. How to verify further

To be exhaustive, check medical journal databases for any authored pieces by Gupta referencing Neurocept and review primary‑source statements from Dr. Gupta or CNN (press releases, social media posts) that might be published after these articles. The sources at hand already document Gupta’s public denial and an investigative claim that Neurocept’s advertising is fraudulent ^{[1] [2]}.