Is it normal for a guy with a 7 inch penis to get turned on by seeing men with 5 inch penises?

1. How researchers frame “normal” arousal: variability, not a single pathway

Experimental and survey research on penis size finds modest, inconsistent associations with arousal and attractiveness: some participants respond more strongly to larger depictions while others do not, and traits such as erotophilia (openness to sexual stimuli) and sexual experience moderate those responses ^[1]. Large, well‑controlled studies of attractiveness show penis size interacts with other traits (height, body shape) to influence judgments, which means size is one cue among many and its effect is contextually bound rather than deterministic ^{[2] [5]}.

2. Why a 7‑inch man might be aroused by a 5‑inch man — three psychological routes

First, sexual attraction includes comparative and relational dynamics: men can be aroused by similarity, contrast, dominance/submission scripts, or simply novelty, none of which map directly onto absolute measurements ^[6]. Second, erotic orientation and erotophilia predict differential responses to explicit stimuli, so someone more erotophilic may respond to a broader or different set of cues than someone erotophobic ^[1]. Third, social and evolutionary signaling research suggests genital size can function as a cue in male‑male assessment and attractiveness judgments, so a smaller penis in one social role can trigger arousal through status, role, or aesthetic pathways rather than simple numerical preference ^{[2] [5]}.

3. Counterpoints and limits in the literature: size matters sometimes, but evidence is mixed

Several studies and reviews find signals that larger penis size can increase perceived attractiveness in some conditions and correlate with certain partner preferences, while other work finds width or body proportions matter more and that many partners report size is overrated in real sexual satisfaction ^{[7] [8] [3]}. Urologists and reviewers caution that methodological shortcomings in the literature prevent firm conclusions about the importance of penis size for partner satisfaction or universal arousal patterns ^[4]. Importantly, no provided source offers a definitive experimental test specifically of whether men with larger penises are commonly aroused by smaller ones, so the statement rests on inference from related findings ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

4. Social influences, anxiety, and commercial narratives that can skew perception of “normal”

Comparisons driven by pornography, locker‑room norms, and commercial marketplaces that sell enlargement or confidence products amplify concern and shape sexual scripts; mental‑health reporting links penis size worry to anxiety, low self‑esteem, and altered sexual functioning, which can in turn modify who or what arouses someone ^{[6] [9]}. Some online sources that claim strong neurobiological mechanisms or breathtaking effects lack robust peer‑reviewed backing and may have commercial motives, so these need treating as promotional rather than dispositive evidence ^{[10] [9]}.

5. Practical takeaways for interpreting “normal” sexual reactions

Normal sexual response is broad: being aroused by a variety of partners and by different physical attributes — including seeing men with smaller, larger, or similar penises — falls within the documented diversity of human sexuality, as research consistently emphasizes individual differences and context over simple size rules ^{[1] [2] [4]}. If size‑related feelings cause distress, clinicians and sex therapists discuss cognitive reframing, focus on relational/behavioral skills, and address body image concerns; the literature documents psychological harms from size anxiety even when anatomy is medically typical ^{[6] [4]}. Where the cited research is silent — specifically experimental tests of cross‑size arousal among men with different erect sizes — no firm claim can be made beyond the reasonable inference that variability is normal ^{[1] [2]}.