Will some infants experience sudden deaths after vaccination by coincidence
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The question of whether some infants experience sudden deaths after vaccination by coincidence is a complex one, with various analyses presenting different viewpoints. Some studies suggest a possible link between vaccination and sudden infant death, with one analysis finding that 58% of infant deaths reported to VAERS occurred within 3 days post-vaccination and 78.3% occurred within 7 days post-vaccination [1]. Another study estimates that the overall estimated probability of vaccination within the last 24 hours for a child who has died of SIDS is 1.3%, and within 48 hours is 2.6%, implying that coincident vaccination and SIDS can be expected to occur at least annually in Australia by chance alone [2]. However, other analyses argue that the temporal association between infant vaccination and SIDS is coincidental and not causal, citing studies that found no increased risk of SIDS after immunization [3]. A 2011 study argues that higher numbers of vaccine doses correlate with higher infant mortality, suggesting that some sudden infant deaths may be linked to vaccine toxicity [4]. In contrast, a 2024 modelling of the Expanded Programme on Immunization quantifies massive lives saved by vaccines and attributes a substantial share of the decline in infant mortality to vaccination, providing no evidence that infant deaths after vaccination are coincidental [5]. A meta-analysis found that immunizations are associated with a significantly lower risk of SIDS, with a summary odds ratio of 0.54, indicating a halving of the risk of SIDS [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key missing context in the original statement is the lack of consideration of the overall benefit of vaccines in reducing infant mortality, as highlighted by the 2024 modelling of the Expanded Programme on Immunization [5]. Another missing context is the variability in the definition and diagnosis of SIDS, which can impact the accuracy of studies examining the relationship between vaccination and SIDS [3]. Alternative viewpoints include the possibility that vaccines may have a protective effect against SIDS, as suggested by the meta-analysis [6], and the idea that coincident vaccination and SIDS can be expected to occur by chance alone, as estimated by the Australian study [2]. The mechanism by which vaccines may influence SIDS risk is also not well understood and requires further research [6]. Additionally, the impact of vaccine dosage and schedule on infant mortality is a topic of ongoing debate, with some studies suggesting a possible link between higher vaccine doses and increased infant mortality [4].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading by implying a causal link between vaccination and sudden infant death, when in fact the relationship between the two is complex and not fully understood [1]. The statement may also be biased towards presenting a negative view of vaccines, by highlighting the possibility of coincidental vaccination and SIDS without considering the overall benefit of vaccines in reducing infant mortality [5]. The pharmaceutical industry and vaccine manufacturers may benefit from a positive portrayal of vaccines, while anti-vaccination groups may benefit from a negative portrayal of vaccines [4]. Additionally, parents and caregivers may be misled by the statement and unnecessarily frightened about the safety of vaccines, which could impact vaccination rates and public health [3]. It is essential to consider multiple sources and viewpoints when evaluating the relationship between vaccination and sudden infant death, as presented in the various analyses [1] [3] [2] [4] [5] [6].