Which states saw the largest declines or increases in reported abortions 2022–2025 and why?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The largest reported declines in clinician‑provided abortions between 2022 and 2025 occurred in states that enacted stringent short‑limit bans—most prominently Florida and South Carolina—while the largest increases were concentrated in states that either reopened access after legal uncertainty (Wisconsin) or served as destinations for out‑of‑state care (Arizona, California, Kansas, Ohio, Virginia) [1] [2] [3]. These shifts reflect a mix of new state restrictions, court reversals, cross‑state travel and telehealth expansion, and methodological differences among data sources [4] [5] [6].
1. Where the steepest declines appeared and the proximate causes
Florida and South Carolina registered particularly sharp declines in clinician‑provided abortions after implementing six‑week bans—Florida’s ban took effect in May 2024 and was associated with roughly 12,100 fewer abortions in 2024 compared with 2023, while South Carolina saw about 3,500 fewer abortions—changes Guttmacher and reporting outlets directly link to the new laws narrowing in‑state access [1] [2] [4]. Those declines also reflect enforcement dynamics and criminal‑legal threats that can deter in‑state provision and reporting, amplifying measurable drops where bans are strict and actively enforced [2].
2. States with the largest reported increases and why they rose
Several states recorded substantial increases: Wisconsin’s clinician‑provided abortions jumped dramatically after a late‑2023 court ruling restored legal provision following months of near‑total unavailability, producing a roughly 388% increase from about 1,300 abortions in 2023 to about 6,100 in 2024 [3]. Other states showing sizeable rises—Arizona, California, Kansas, Ohio and Virginia—acted as destinations for people traveling from restricted neighboring states or expanded telehealth and in‑clinic capacity to meet regional demand, contributing to net increases in provision [1] [4] [5].
3. Regional patterns: travel, telehealth and “protective” states versus bans
Data show a clear bifurcation: states with protective laws continued to absorb out‑of‑state demand while ban states saw local volumes fall, so that increases in destination states partially offset declines elsewhere; in 2024 an estimated 155,000 people crossed state lines for abortion care (about 15% of abortions in non‑ban states), a modest decline from 2023 but still far above pre‑Dobbs levels [1] [4]. Telehealth provision also expanded substantially from 5% in mid‑2022 to 27% by mid‑2025, enabling legal access for some people living in ban states and shifting where and how abortions were reported [5].
4. Methodology and data limitations that shape the headline changes
Comparing 2022–2025 trends requires care because sources differ: the CDC’s most recent national surveillance covers 2022 only and excludes several jurisdictions, while Guttmacher’s Monthly Abortion Provision Study and the Society for Family Planning’s #WeCount produce more current, modeled and provider‑reported monthly counts capturing cross‑state flows and telehealth [6] [1] [5]. That means large percentage swings in states with previously near‑zero reported provision (e.g., Wisconsin) can reflect restored reporting as much as true population‑level incidence, and totals vary by source depending on data coverage and modeling choices [3] [6].
5. Alternative explanations, political incentives and what remains uncertain
Analysts agree the dominant drivers are legal change, court rulings, and migration of care, but alternative explanations also matter: clinic capacity, funding for travel and abortion funds, prosecutorial behavior, and evolving telemedicine policies all influence where abortions happen and are counted [4] [5] [7]. Sources have implicit perspectives—Guttmacher emphasizes access impacts and cross‑state flow [1] [4], #WeCount focuses on real‑time provider‑reported volume including telehealth [5], and the CDC provides conservative, lagged surveillance [6]—so the precise ranking of states by increase or decline can shift depending on which dataset is used.
6. Bottom line and reporting caveats
The clearest, consistent finding across contemporary reporting is that states enacting six‑week and total bans (notably Florida and South Carolina) show the deepest declines in in‑state clinician‑provided abortions, while states that either regained legal provision (Wisconsin) or served as regional providers (Arizona, California, Kansas, Ohio, Virginia) show the largest increases; however, data limitations, cross‑state travel and telehealth mean these patterns reflect redistribution of care as much as net changes in need [1] [3] [5] [6].