Which states had the largest absolute and percentage increases in COVID‑19 mortality in 2020, and how do those map to male life‑expectancy declines?

Checked on January 13, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

In 2020 the largest absolute increases in deaths from COVID‑19 were concentrated in the most populous states—California recorded the biggest jump in raw deaths (an increase of just over 50,000 versus 2019) while states in the Mountain and Southwest registered the highest mortality rates per 100,000 people, with Arizona repeatedly cited as having the highest COVID death rate (per 100k) [1] [2] [3]. National analyses show large, uneven declines in male life expectancy driven by COVID‑19 and associated excess deaths—Hispanic and Black males suffered the biggest losses at the population level—but the reporting provided does not supply a complete, comparable table of male life‑expectancy declines by state to make a precise state‑by‑state mapping [4] [5] [6] [7].

1. The difference between absolute counts and per‑capita mortality — why California and Arizona both “lead”

Public data emphasize two different truths: absolute increases in deaths are largest where more people live, while per‑capita mortality captures how lethal the pandemic was relative to the population; California recorded the largest absolute increase in deaths in 2020 (about +50,000 deaths versus 2019), reflecting its population size and pandemic burden [1] [2], whereas Arizona is consistently reported as having one of the highest COVID death rates per 100,000 population [3], a pattern also echoed in IHME/Lancet state analyses that rank Arizona, Washington, DC, and New Mexico among the highest standardised COVID death‑rate states [8].

2. Which states had the largest percentage increases in mortality in 2020

Across sources the clearest signal is that several less populous states and territories and parts of the Mountain/Southwest showed very large percentage increases in mortality because pre‑pandemic baselines were lower and outbreaks were intense; IHME/Lancet state‑level work documents four‑fold variation in standardised COVID death rates with the worst impacts in Arizona, DC, and New Mexico [8], while CDC and aggregated trackers show Arizona among the highest per‑capita rates [9] [3]. However, the exact ranked list of state percentage increases (percent change in all‑cause deaths 2019→2020) is not directly extractable from the provided snippets; where specific percentage increases are cited for a state (California ≈ +19% increase in total deaths), that comes from PPIC’s aggregation [1].

3. How those mortality patterns map onto male life‑expectancy declines — national signal, local data gap

Large national studies and demographic analyses demonstrate that COVID‑19 was the dominant cause of the 2020 drop in U.S. life expectancy and that the burden fell disproportionately on men, Hispanic males and Black males experiencing some of the largest year‑to‑year losses (Hispanic males ~4.5 years or large increases in years of life lost; Black males also among the largest declines) [4] [5] [6]. It follows logically that states with higher COVID mortality rates would tend to see larger declines in male life expectancy, but the supplied materials do not include a definitive state‑by‑state table of male life‑expectancy loss for 2020 in the text excerpts; one research team points users to an app with state‑level results (medicimagic.shinyapps.io) but that app’s data are not excerpted here [7]. Thus, direct mapping at the level of “State X had Y increase in COVID deaths and Z years lost for men” cannot be fully asserted from the provided reporting.

4. Competing explanations, structural drivers, and what the sources say about causes

IHME/Lancet and other analyses explicitly link state variation not just to chance but to structural factors—racial inequities, socioeconomic conditions, and political patterns related to mitigation behaviors and policy—that amplified mortality in particular states [8], while demographic studies emphasize that male biological and occupational vulnerabilities plus higher comorbidity burdens raised male mortality [10] [4]. These interpretations carry implicit agendas: public‑health groups focus on structural inequity and access, some trackers emphasize raw counts for policy urgency, and private aggregators spotlight rankings that can be read politically; readers should note each source’s framing when interpreting state‑level comparisons [8] [2].

5. Bottom line and the analytic gap to close

Available reporting identifies California as having the largest absolute increase in deaths in 2020 and Arizona (with New Mexico and DC) among the highest per‑capita COVID mortality states [1] [2] [3] [8], and national demographic research shows the steepest male life‑expectancy drops occurred among Hispanic and Black men [4] [5]. However, the provided sources do not include a ready-made, fully cited state‑by‑state mapping of male life‑expectancy declines for 2020; producing that precise mapping requires the state‑level life‑expectancy output (the medicimagic app referenced) or CDC/NCHS state life‑table estimates, neither of which are present in the excerpts supplied here [7] [9].

Want to dive deeper?
Which states experienced the largest year‑over‑year percent increase in all‑cause mortality in 2020, by exact ranking and percentages?
Where can state‑level male and female life‑expectancy change estimates for 2020 be downloaded (CDC/NCHS or academic repositories) and how are they calculated?
How did structural factors (race/ethnicity, occupation, political control, health access) statistically explain state variation in COVID‑19 death rates in 2020 according to IHME/Lancet analyses?