Are there statistics for women's claim that they want to be dominated or raped
Executive summary
Multiple studies and polls measure women’s interest in dominance/submission as a sexual preference or fantasy — many report large shares who fantasize about being dominated or who enjoy consensual “rough” sex — but there is no robust, ethically collected evidence that large numbers of women “want to be raped,” and researchers and community sources draw a strict line between consensual dominance and nonconsensual assault [1] [2] [3].
1. What the data actually measure: fantasies, roles, and consensual kink
Most published figures concern consensual sexual fantasies or role preferences (being dominant, submissive, or “switch”), not an expressed desire for nonconsensual violence; for example, a 2014-style survey and clinical reviews report that many women report fantasies of being dominated — figures around 65% are widely cited in secondary writeups and summaries of the Journal of Sexual Medicine work [1] [2], while community and clinical surveys of kink practitioners document diversity in roles and motivations rather than an appetite for harm [3] [4].
2. Polls and prevalence: what representative surveys show
Population polling gives a mixed but clear signal that a substantial minority embrace D/s (dominance/submission) preferences: a 2015 YouGov poll found 21% of women saying they would rather be submissive in bed versus 4% wanting to be dominant, and reported that about 53% of Americans said they had some preference for dominance or submission in sex [5]. Large international and probability samples of BDSM interest find nontrivial interest—one survey synthesis found roughly 35–38% of women reported some BDSM interest [6]—but sampling, question wording, and whether desire equals behavior vary across studies [6] [4].
3. Distinguishing “being dominated” from “wanting rape” in research and practice
Scholars emphasize that fantasy about being dominated is not equivalent to wanting actual nonconsensual sex; BDSM literature and kink-community research stress consent frameworks (SSC, RACK) and note many participants differentiate eroticized power-play from real coercion [3] [7]. Academic reviewers caution that fantasies can concern scenarios of surrender or roughness while still presupposing consent and safety, and that survey items rarely — and ethically cannot easily — ask people whether they “want to be raped” [3] [1].
4. Measurement limits: frequency, intensity, and representative data gaps
Researchers warn that available datasets often lack nationally representative, nuanced measures: frequency and intensity of fantasies differ and men and women may report similar rates of having certain fantasies at least sometimes even if experience differs in intensity or context [1]. Many studies use convenience or community samples (kink practitioners, clinic patients) or broad poll items, so extrapolating to “most” women is inappropriate [4] [3].
5. Social context and interpretation: power, attraction, and inequality
Work linking social dominance beliefs and sexual dynamics shows that gendered power beliefs shape how people interpret submissiveness in sex; some women who associate sex with submissiveness report lower sexual autonomy, which complicates interpretation of prevalence figures and points to the importance of social context in these responses [8]. Evolutionary, cultural, and interpersonal studies also produce mixed signals about whether dominance is attractive in partners depending on context (short-term vs. long-term) and prestige cues [9] [10].
6. Bottom line and reporting caveats
There are solid data showing many women report fantasies of being dominated or an interest in consensual BDSM/rough sex (citations vary, with figures like ~21% preferring submissiveness in one poll and ~35–65% appearing in different studies depending on measures) [5] [6] [1]. However, there is no reputable evidence showing women broadly “want to be raped,” and both researchers and kink-community sources insist on separating consensual erotic roles from nonconsensual assault; available research is also limited by sampling, question wording, and the ethical impossibility of soliciting endorsement of nonconsensual acts [3] [1].