Product called sugar control promoted by Dr Phil and Dr Oz to cure diabetes???

1. The viral claim and what the evidence actually shows

Multiple investigations and expert analyses have traced viral Facebook and ad campaigns that pair celebrity faces—often doctored video or fabricated testimonials—with “miracle” diabetes products such as CBD gummies or unnamed supplements; independent fact‑checks conclude those ads are fake and that the celebrities did not promote or endorse the cures ^{[1] [6] [3]}. University of California–Berkeley’s Hany Farid and organizations like Poynter/PolitiFact have identified deepfakes and bogus ads that falsely attribute endorsements to Dr. Oz, and Dr. Oz himself has publicly decried fake “Dr. Oz Diabetes Breakthrough” pitches as scams ^{[1] [6] [2]}.

2. Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz: disclaimers, denials and activism against scammers

Both media figures have been the targets of identity‑theft style marketing; reporting and statements show they do not endorse third‑party “gummy” or supplement cures and have urged platforms and regulators to act against deceptive ads that use their names to sell unproven products ^{[3] [2]}. That pattern is documented in news and consumer‑protection coverage showing repetitive misuse of celebrity images to lend credibility to fraudulent medical claims ^{[3] [2]}.

3. What these “sugar control” products typically are — and what the science says

The products hawked in bogus ads commonly include CBD gummies or supplement blends with ingredients like cinnamon, chromium, vinegar, or herbal extracts; some of those ingredients have small, mixed clinical signals for modest blood‑sugar effects, but none are substitutes for prescribed diabetes medications and standard care, nor do they cure diabetes ^{[7] [5]}. Health reporting emphasizes that lifestyle interventions and evidence‑based medications remain the proven path for diabetes management, and that single‑ingredient or multi‑herbal pills lack the robust randomized‑trial data required to claim cure ^{[5] [4]}.

4. Why these scams spread—and who benefits

The ads exploit public desire for quick fixes for a widespread chronic disease, using celebrity faces and emotional narratives to drive clicks and subscriptions; scammers profit from sales, subscription traps, and stolen payment data while leaving buyers with ineffective or potentially unsafe products ^{[2] [3]}. Platforms’ ad systems and lax verification let these messages amplify rapidly, which is why journalists and physicians have repeatedly flagged the same fraudulent offers over multiple years ^[2].

5. How to tell legitimate diabetes advances from hype

Credible diabetes treatments appear in peer‑reviewed journals, have FDA approval when marketed as drugs, and are discussed by endocrine societies and professional clinicians—claims that a simple gummy or “sugar control” pill cures diabetes within days, backed only by flashy ads, are a red flag ^{[8] [5]}. Fact‑checkers and academic experts recommend verifying endorsements on an individual’s official channels, checking for regulatory approval, and consulting a healthcare provider before stopping prescribed therapy ^{[1] [2]}.

6. A balanced closing: limited promise, real risks

It is fair to acknowledge that some natural compounds show modest glucose‑lowering effects in limited studies, which motivates ongoing research, but the balance of evidence does not support marketing those ingredients as cures or the use of celebrity‑styled ads to sell them; consumers face real health and financial risks if they abandon medical care for an advertised “sugar control” product ^{[5] [7]}. Where investigations exist, they point not to a new miracle endorsed by Dr. Phil or Dr. Oz but to a persistent, evolving fraud problem that regulators and the platforms still struggle to stamp out ^{[1] [2]}.