Https://thesupplement.pro/
Executive summary
TheSupplement.pro is a content-driven supplement information site that mixes an individual author’s expertise and personal testing framework with topic guides and product recommendations, but it is not a substitute for independent laboratory verification or peer-reviewed synthesis; readers should treat its guidance as informed commentary that requires cross-checking with independent test services and clinical literature [1] [2] [3].
1. What this site is and who runs it
TheSupplement.pro (also presented as The Supplement Pro) publishes articles on supplements, nutrients and protocols and frames itself around an author who claims certification as a nutrition coach and a history of writing books and fitness programs, plus a proprietary “Supplement Facts Panel” (SFP) analysis formula that the author says they developed and use when writing reviews [3] [1].
2. What kind of content and claims appear on the site
Article examples on the site include deep dives such as an “Ursolic Acid Supplement – A Comprehensive Guide” and pieces on creatine and tongkat ali that cite studies, COAs (Certificates of Analysis), and named academics; the site references peer-reviewed literature and books in its guides and suggests checking COAs and customer reviews when assessing products [2] [1].
3. Credibility signals and their limits
Credibility cues include the author’s stated certifications and sporting background and occasional mention of seminars with known academics (e.g., Professor Eric Rawson) or experts [3] [1], but those credentials are self-presented on the site and the available snapshots do not show independent third-party testing by the site itself nor systematic disclosures of conflicts of interest, so the reader cannot rely solely on internal signals without external validation [3] [1].
4. How the site compares with independent testing outfits
Independent testing and review services such as ConsumerLab and sites that employ licensed pharmacists or MD reviewers (e.g., ConsumerLab.com and SupplementCritique) exist precisely because product labels and vendor claims can be inaccurate; these organizations run lab assays and publish data-driven pass/fail results, a capability not evident in TheSupplement.pro’s publicly visible materials [4] [5] [6].
5. Areas where the site is useful
TheSupplement.pro appears useful for accessible syntheses and practical recommendations—explaining COAs, formulation forms (capsule vs. extract), and summarizing some studies—making it a good starting point for learning about a supplement’s theory of action and shopping considerations [2] [1].
6. Areas of caution and potential bias
Readers should be cautious because the site blends personal experience and an internal scoring system (the SFP) that may emphasize criteria differently than independent labs or systematic reviews; some articles cite books or single studies without showing a transparent, reproducible evidence synthesis or raw data, and the lack of visible independent laboratory testing or clear conflict-of-interest statements raises the risk of unintentional bias [3] [2].
7. Practical recommendation for readers
Use TheSupplement.pro as an informed primer: note the author’s recommendations and explanations, then cross-verify any product quality claims by looking for COAs and third-party lab results and by consulting independent test sites like ConsumerLab or medically-reviewed critique sites before purchasing or taking supplements [2] [4] [5].