Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did Trump administration change federal regulations on nursing licensure or scope of practice?
Executive summary
The Department of Education under the Trump administration proposed excluding nursing from the federal definition of “professional degree” programs for certain student-loan rules, a change that nursing groups say will limit loan eligibility and affect hundreds of thousands of nursing students [1] [2]. Separately, the administration has issued executive directives and orders urging federal review of Medicare and other federal rules that could reduce federal barriers to advanced practice nurses’ scope of practice, but those efforts intersect with state licensure authority and largely produce recommendations rather than immediate nationwide licensure changes [3] [4].
1. What actually changed: student‑loan classification, not state licensure
The clearest reported federal action is the Department of Education’s shift to exclude nursing from its list of “professional degree” programs for forthcoming loan eligibility and borrowing‑cap rules; Newsweek and other outlets describe the change as removing nursing from a category that can affect graduate and professional student loan caps and forgiveness eligibility [1] [5]. The American Nurses Association (ANA) published a formal statement stressing that the Education Department’s proposed loan policy change excludes nursing from the “professional degree” definition and expressing concern about impacts on funding and workforce pipelines [2].
2. Why nursing groups say this matters: money, pipeline, and parity
Nursing organizations including the ANA and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing pushed back immediately, arguing the exclusion undermines parity with other licensed health professions and will limit access to federal graduate financing for nurses pursuing advanced practice roles—an outcome the ANA says threatens workforce retention and patient care in underserved areas [2] [6]. Reporting cites enrollment figures (over 260,000 in BSN programs and about 42,000 in ADN programs) to frame the scale of potentially affected students [1] [5].
3. Scope‑of‑practice: federal nudges, not a wholesale federal takeover
Separately, the administration’s executive actions have instructed federal agencies (notably HHS and Medicare rulemakers) to review “supervision requirements, conditions of participation, and licensure requirements in Medicare” that the administration viewed as limiting clinicians—including advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs)—from practicing at the top of their training [4]. Advocacy and state nursing groups note the executive orders produce recommendations and regulatory proposals that could remove federal restrictions on APRN activities, but professional licensure and scope of practice remain primarily state‑level authorities, so federal directives face limits to immediate nationwide change [3] [4].
4. Practical limits: federal rules vs. state licensure authority
Reporting and advocacy analysis emphasize the legal reality that professional licensure is regulated by states; any federal effort to change “scope of practice” nationally must either target federal program rules (e.g., Medicare conditions) or rely on incentives, guidance, and regulatory adjustments rather than directly revoking state licenses [3]. Nursing advocates welcomed federal attention to APRN barriers but warned of resistance from state medical lobbies and the need for legislative or state regulatory action to lock in sweeping scope‑of‑practice changes [3].
5. Competing perspectives and political context
The administration framed its actions as expanding patient access and allowing clinicians to work “to the full extent” of their training, while nursing organizations framed the student‑loan reclassification as a damaging cut to education and a devaluation of nursing as a profession [4] [2]. Independent outlets and nursing trade coverage highlight both the potential for expanded APRN roles under federal Medicare guidance and the immediate financial harms of the Education Department’s loan policy shift [7] [1].
6. What reporting does not say or resolve
Available sources do not mention that the Department of Education’s classification change directly alters state nursing licensure requirements or that any single federal rule immediately removed state scope‑of‑practice laws; those remain controlled at the state level (not found in current reporting). Sources also do not provide final regulatory texts in full detail here—coverage focuses on announced proposals, agency statements, and reactions from nursing groups rather than step‑by‑step legal implementation timelines [1] [2] [4].
7. Bottom line for nurses, patients, and policymakers
In short: yes, the Trump administration’s Education Department has proposed a federal rule change reclassifying nursing for certain student‑loan purposes—a move nursing groups say will limit funding and harm the nursing pipeline [1] [2]. Separately, the administration has pushed federal agencies to review and recommend removing some federal restrictions on APRN practice, but those actions stop short of overruling state licensure and would work through federal regulatory processes and incentives rather than instantly changing scope‑of‑practice across all states [4] [3].