Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did the Trump administration propose regulatory changes affecting nursing licensure or scope of practice?
Executive summary
The available reporting shows the Trump administration and its Department of Education have proposed and begun implementing regulatory and policy moves that affect nursing—most prominently removing nursing from a Department of Education list of “professional degree” programs tied to higher federal graduate borrowing limits, a change critics say will affect hundreds of thousands of students (reports cite ~260,000 BSN and ~42,000 ADN enrollees) [1] [2]. The administration has also advanced executive actions aimed at changing federal rules that could loosen supervision or licensure-related constraints on Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRN), though those scope-of-practice changes would run into state licensure authority and require later rulemaking [3] [4].
1. What the Education Department change actually does — loan classification and limits
In November 2025 the Department of Education announced that nursing would no longer be classified among the federal government’s list of “professional degree” programs that qualify for higher graduate borrowing limits under the administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a change that commentators and nursing groups say will tighten federal loan access for nursing master’s and doctoral students [1] [2] [5]. Reporting and advocacy groups quantify the potential reach: there are roughly 260,000 students in entry-level BSN programs and about 42,000 in ADN programs, and nursing organizations warn the reclassification could make advanced nursing education more expensive and worsen staffing shortages [1] [2].
2. Nursing groups’ response — alarm and policy advocacy
National nursing organizations, including the American Nurses Association and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, publicly criticized the Department of Education move, calling it a setback for parity with other health professions and urging the Department to reconsider because of the practical effects on workforce development and access to care, especially in underserved areas [6] [7]. Advocacy and opinion pieces frame the policy as undermining nursing’s professional status and warn about longer-term consequences for recruitment and retention [8] [5].
3. Executive orders and the push on APRN scope — federal aims vs. state licensure limits
Separately, the administration has issued executive directives aimed at reducing federal “supervision requirements, conditions of participation, and licensure requirements in Medicare” that it says limit clinicians from “practicing at the top of their profession,” language that specifically references Advanced Practice Registered Nurses and physician assistants and signals forthcoming regulatory proposals [3]. State-level licensure remains the primary regulator of scope of practice, and stakeholders explicitly note any federal recommendations would face implementation obstacles at the state level and pushback from medical industry groups [4] [3].
4. How these two threads interact — financing vs. practice authority
The Education Department action affects financing of nursing education; the executive-policy thread targets federal regulatory barriers in federal programs (e.g., Medicare) that can influence how APRNs practice in federally funded settings. They are distinct levers: loan classification changes influence who can afford advanced nursing degrees, while scope-of-practice initiatives seek to change conditions under which APRNs deliver care—each has separate pathways and limits [1] [3] [4].
5. Points of disagreement and uncertainty in current reporting
Coverage converges on the Education Department’s reclassification and nursing groups’ objections [1] [7], but available reporting does not provide a finalized rule text or full implementation timeline in every account; some outlets state the changes are set to be implemented by July 1, 2026, while others focus on advocacy responses and projected impacts [2]. Sources also vary on the magnitude of long-term workforce impact—nursing organizations warn of damage to supply, while the administration frames actions as budgetary and regulatory realignment; definitive causal outcomes are not reported in the materials provided [1] [8].
6. What to watch next — rulemaking, timelines, and state actions
Key things to watch are formal rule documents and effective dates from the Department of Education and any Notices of Proposed Rulemaking or agency guidance tied to the executive directives that could alter Medicare or other federal program conditions for APRNs; because licensure is primarily a state responsibility, state legislatures and boards will be decisive if scope-of-practice changes are to take practical effect [3] [4]. Nursing organizations’ ongoing advocacy and any court or Congressional responses will shape whether these proposals become durable policy [7].
Limitations: reporting in the provided results centers on the Education Department reclassification and executive-level proposals; full regulatory texts, official rulemaking dockets, or comprehensive impact analyses are not present in the current set of sources, so precise legal mechanics and quantified long-term effects are not found in current reporting [1] [3].