Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Were there executive orders or legislation under Trump that reclassified healthcare occupations including nursing?
Executive summary
The Department of Education, as part of implementation of President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBBA), has moved to exclude nursing from its revamped definition of “professional degree,” which will cap graduate student borrowing at $100,000 vs. $200,000 for degrees labeled “professional” and eliminate certain Grad PLUS access for nursing students [1] [2]. Multiple news outlets and nursing groups report the change and warn it could make advanced nursing education more expensive and affect workforce supply; executive orders on health under Trump exist but the nursing reclassification is being carried out via the Education Department’s rulemaking tied to the OBBBA rather than a single presidential executive order [3] [4].
1. What changed and who is affected: a concrete shift in loan classification
The Department of Education’s new definition removes nursing from the “professional degree” category in rules tied to the OBBBA, meaning nursing graduate students face a $100,000 lifetime graduate-borrowing cap and loss of Grad PLUS eligibility that other “professional” programs retain with a $200,000 cap [1] [2]. Coverage across Newsweek, Nurse.org and local outlets describes affected cohorts including BSN, ADN, and advanced practice nursing students and quotes nursing organizations warning of practical consequences [2] [3] [5].
2. How this was implemented: legislation vs. departmental rulemaking vs. executive orders
Reporting indicates the change is part of implementing provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill — a legislative package signed by President Trump — and the Department of Education’s subsequent regulatory definitions, not solely a standalone executive order declaring nursing “non‑professional” [1] [6]. Separate Trump health-related executive orders exist and the administration has issued many health‑policy EOs in 2025, but sources show the nursing classification stems from the Education Department acting under the OBBBA framework [4] [1].
3. Administration broader healthcare actions: many EOs, varied aims
Since January 2025 the Trump administration has signed scores of executive orders touching health policy — rescinding Biden-era drug-pricing initiatives, restructuring HHS, pausing rulemaking, and directing agency actions — which collectively reshape regulatory context for health professions and funding but do not by themselves reclassify degree types [4] [7] [8]. Legal and policy trackers (Federal Register, Ballotpedia, law firm briefs) list numerous health-related EOs; they change agency direction but statutory or regulatory changes (like ED’s degree definitions) follow separate processes [4] [9] [7].
4. Arguments and reactions: nursing groups, universities, and lawmakers
The American Nurses Association, AACN and other nursing advocates call the move “deeply concerning,” saying the change undermines parity between health professions and could deter students from pursuing advanced practice roles amid an existing shortage [1] [10]. Higher‑education and student‑loan analysts also warn caps and loss of Grad PLUS will materially increase out‑of‑pocket cost for many programs [2] [10]. Congressional and partisan reactions vary across reporting; some Republican policy briefs and administration materials emphasize fiscal restraint and redefinition of loan limits as budgetary reforms [11] [12].
5. What the reporting does — and does not — show (limitations)
Available sources consistently report the Education Department’s exclusion of nursing from the “professional degree” list and link it to the OBBBA implementation [1] [2]. They do not show a single Trump executive order directly stating “nursing is no longer a professional degree”; rather, this is an administrative/legislative implementation choice [1] [6]. Sources also do not quantify long‑term workforce impacts beyond warnings and enrollment figures cited by nursing organizations; rigorous longitudinal effects are not in current reporting [2] [3].
6. Alternatives, politics and implicit agendas to watch
Proponents of the OBBBA frame loan caps as deficit control and a reallocation of student-loan benefits; critics argue the definition shift disproportionately impacts female-dominated health fields and could worsen clinician shortfalls [10] [13]. Watch for agency rulemaking records, Department of Education notices and Congressional hearings for more detailed justification, legal rationale, and potential reversals or carve-outs — those documents will clarify whether this is a permanent policy shift or subject to judicial or legislative challenge [1] [4].
7. What you can check next (sources to follow)
Follow the Department of Education’s formal rulemaking notices and the Federal Register entries implementing the OBBBA definition change, statements from AACN and the American Nurses Association for enrollment and workforce data, and Congressional committee activity that may seek to amend loan limits or restore Grad PLUS access [1] [3] [4]. These primary documents will determine whether the practical impact changes before implementation dates cited in reporting [6].