Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How much do undocumented immigrants use emergency Medicaid versus full Medicaid services in 2023–2025?
Executive Summary
A recent body of analyses shows that emergency Medicaid for undocumented immigrants comprises a very small share of total Medicaid spending — under 1%, with one widely cited estimate placing it at about 0.4% of Medicaid spending in 2022 and an average emergency-Medicaid cost of roughly $9.63 per resident; scholars conclude that cutting emergency Medicaid would yield minimal federal savings while risking harm to states with large undocumented populations [1]. At the same time, researchers and federal guidance emphasize substantial state-by-state variation in who can access emergency versus broader state-funded programs for ongoing care, producing an uneven landscape of coverage and notable gaps for chronic conditions [2] [3].
1. Why the headline number matters — emergency Medicaid is a sliver of total spending
The central empirical claim is quantitative: emergency Medicaid expenditures for undocumented immigrants are a tiny fraction of overall Medicaid outlays, with JAMA-published analysis and an accompanying study reporting figures around 0.4% of total Medicaid spending in 2022 and per-resident costs near $9.63, a metric used to show relative scale and fiscal impact [1]. These figures anchor the debate because they counter narratives that undocumented immigrants are driving large increases in Medicaid spending. The studies stress that, on aggregate, emergency-only eligibility limits both service use and spending; emergency Medicaid pays only for treatment of acute conditions, not for routine management of chronic disease, which keeps aggregate emergency spending low [4] [1]. Policymakers use this scale to evaluate proposals to restrict or expand coverage.
2. The legal and administrative constraint — federal limits make emergency-only common
Federal Medicaid rules restrict noncitizen eligibility for full Medicaid in most cases, leaving undocumented immigrants generally eligible only for Emergency Medicaid for treatment of true emergency medical conditions. CMS guidance reiterates that federal financial participation is available only for services necessary to treat an emergency medical condition, not for ongoing care [4]. Because federal funds cannot be used to cover non-emergency services for undocumented immigrants, states face a trade-off: they can either allow only emergency care under federal rules or spend state dollars to provide broader coverage. This legal architecture explains why emergency-only coverage remains prevalent and why national spending shares for emergency services are relatively small compared with full Medicaid for lawfully eligible populations [3] [4].
3. State variation changes the lived reality — coverage is a patchwork
Analysts document substantial variation across states: many states and D.C. restrict publicly funded care for undocumented immigrants to emergency services for the duration of the emergency, while a subset of states uses state funds to extend broader prenatal, child, or even adult coverage. A nationwide landscape analysis found 37 jurisdictions offering Emergency Medicaid for the duration of the emergency only, and highlighted persistent gaps in care for chronic conditions and ongoing needs [2]. This leads to markedly different utilization patterns: in states that fund broader programs, undocumented immigrants access more non-emergency services through state Medicaid-like programs, while in others emergency departments become the default point of care, shaping utilization metrics and local budgets [2] [5].
4. What researchers warn about policy changes — small savings, outsized harms
Researchers warn that proposals to eliminate or sharply restrict emergency Medicaid would produce limited budgetary savings given emergency spending’s small share of total Medicaid, but could cause disproportionate harms to patients and hospitals that serve large undocumented populations. The JAMA study concludes that cutting emergency Medicaid would save little at the federal level and would shift uncompensated care burdens to hospitals and states, particularly those with higher numbers of undocumented residents [1]. Health policy fact-checks also observe that expanding other federal programs or reversing policy cuts would not necessarily extend eligibility to undocumented immigrants without specific legislative or state-funded actions [6] [3].
5. Evidence gaps, timing, and what remains uncertain
Despite consistent cross-source findings about scale and variation, important uncertainties remain about 2023–2025 utilization trends: the most-cited spending estimate references 2022 data and analyses published in 2025, and state policy changes since 2023 may have shifted utilization locally. Sources note that coverage for noncitizens is evolving through state initiatives, litigation, and administrative guidance, and that precise, up-to-date national totals for 2023–2025 emergency versus full Medicaid utilization among undocumented immigrants are limited in public datasets [1] [2] [3]. This means policymakers and reporters should treat headline percentages as directional and corroborate them with the latest state-level fiscal reports and CMS guidance when assessing current-year impacts [4] [2].