Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the risks of urethral sounding and safer harm-reduction practices if someone insists on trying it?
Executive summary
Urethral sounding carries clear, repeatedly documented risks including urinary tract infection (UTI), bleeding, urethral trauma (tearing, rupture), retained foreign body requiring extraction, stricture (narrowing), bladder perforation and possible long‑term sexual/voiding problems [1] [2] [3] [4]. Medical and harm‑reduction guidance that appears across clinician and reputable-patient sites emphasises: use purpose‑made, sterilized sounds, lots of sterile lube, start very small, never force insertion, and seek prompt care for pain, bleeding, fever or difficulty urinating [5] [6] [7].
1. A catalogue of the documented harms: what clinicians report
Case reports and reviews in urology list acute complications — bleeding, infection (UTI), urethral rupture, bladder perforation and foreign bodies migrating into the bladder — and chronic complications such as urethral stricture and recurrent infection; men and women have slightly different risk patterns because anatomical differences affect where objects can lodge or perforate [2] [4] [3] [8].
2. How common are these problems? the limits of the evidence
Large, representative prevalence data are scarce; much of the literature is case reports and surveys of people presenting for care, which over‑represent harms. One internet‑based survey of >2,000 MSM found ~10% had ever sounded and that sounding was associated with higher rates of STIs and some lower urinary tract symptoms, but that still does not establish precise rates of major complications in the general population [9] [10] [11]. Available sources do not provide a reliable denominator for overall complication rates across all practitioners.
3. Major drivers of risk — what makes sounding dangerous
Risk increases when non‑medical objects, unclean implements, inadequate lubrication, forceful insertion, or deeper/oversized instruments are used; porous or sharpened household items increase chances of tearing, retained objects or infection [6] [12] [3]. Delay in seeking care — often driven by stigma — raises the chance that a retained object or perforation will require surgery [2] [13].
4. Practical harm‑reduction steps that sources agree on
Multiple medical and community guides converge on the same practices: use instruments designed for urethral play (medical‑grade stainless steel or smooth silicone) rather than household items; sterilize or buy single‑sterile packaged sounds; apply copious sterile, water‑based lubricant (some advise lube injection to pre‑lubricate); start with the smallest sound and progress very slowly; never force past resistance; maintain strict hygiene and hand/partner cleanliness; and stop if there is sharp pain, bleeding, difficulty urinating or fever [5] [14] [6] [15].
5. When to get medical attention — red flags clinicians cite
Seek immediate care for significant bleeding, inability to urinate, severe pain, fever, or if a device cannot be removed. Case literature shows retained objects and perforations can require cystoscopy or even laparotomy — delaying care because of embarrassment increases morbidity [2] [4] [13].
6. Non‑medical context and behaviour correlations
Researchers note recreational sounding correlates with higher‑risk sexual behaviour and higher self‑reported STI rates in studied populations; some clinical series also report mental‑health comorbidity among patients who repeatedly present with sounding‑related injuries, suggesting heterogeneity among people who practice sounding and potential need for broader counselling alongside urologic care [9] [11] [16].
7. Disagreements, uncertainties and implicit agendas in sources
Clinical case reports emphasise harms and rare severe outcomes because those are what bring people to medical attention [2] [4]; community and kink‑focused guides emphasise safe technique and pleasure while acknowledging risks, which can be read as harm‑reduction advocacy rather than medical endorsement [14] [17]. Because most empirical data are case‑based or self‑selected surveys, sources disagree implicitly on how “safe” occasional, well‑informed sounding really is — reliable population‑level safety estimates are not available in current reporting (not found in current reporting).
8. Bottom line for someone considering sounding
If someone insists on trying sounding, follow established harm‑reduction practices: use purpose‑made, sterilized sounds (medical‑grade stainless steel or smooth silicone), sterile water‑based lube, start tiny and slow, never force, maintain hygiene, and get prompt medical help for bleeding, severe pain, fever or retained devices [5] [6] [14]. Recognise that even with precautions the documented risks (UTI, trauma, retention, stricture, perforation) remain real and that stigma often delays care if a complication occurs [1] [2] [4].
Sources cited above: Medical News Today (overview of risks) [1]; case reports and reviews in PubMed/PMC [2] [4] [3] [8] [13]; survey and association study on recreational sounding [9] [10] [11]; clinical/community harm‑reduction guidance and how‑to resources [5] [6] [14] [15].