What is the estimated number of abortions due to rape or incest in the US in 2024?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive Summary
The strongest, peer-reviewed estimate available in the provided documents places about 64,565 pregnancies resulting from rape in the 14 U.S. states with total abortion bans between July 1, 2022, and January 1, 2024, with 5,586 in states that maintained rape exceptions and 58,979 in states without exceptions [1]. This figure is contested: critics argue the estimate is implausibly high and point to potential calculation or data-source errors, while the study authors defend their methods and say exceptions did not ensure access to care [2] [3].
1. A striking headline number emerges — 64,565 rape-related pregnancies in banned states
The central claim from the January 2024 study is that 64,565 pregnancies resulted from rape in the 14 states with total abortion bans during the 18-month window analyzed, and that most of those — 58,979 — occurred in states without rape exceptions, leaving 5,586 in states that formally had exceptions [1]. The authors present this as a quantitative measure of the burden borne by survivors in those states and as evidence that legal exceptions, where present, did not translate into meaningful in‑state access to abortion services [1] [3]. The estimate is presented as derived from national rape data extrapolated to state populations and timeframes [3].
2. Vocal critics call the figure implausible and flag possible calculation errors
Within weeks of publication, commentators questioned the plausibility of the study’s headline number, arguing it conflicts with other official counts of reported rapes and suggesting the methodology may have produced an inflated total [2]. One critic approximated that errors in the study’s underlying arithmetic could produce over a 600% discrepancy in resulting pregnancy counts, while others called attention to incorrect citations and variable handling that might have skewed results [2]. These critiques prompted the authors to issue responses defending their data sources and analytical approach [2] [3].
3. Authors defend methodology, citing national rape data and modeling choices
The study’s authors responded by asserting they used the most accurate, available national data on rape incidence and a replicable modeling approach to estimate pregnancies resulting from rape within state populations and the specified timeframe [3]. They maintain that while individual-level reporting undercounts sexual assault, population-level estimates capture a larger, more realistic incidence and that their calculus accounts for likely underreporting. The authors also emphasize that even if absolute counts were revised, the distribution between states with and without exceptions remains substantively relevant to policy debates [3].
4. The policy angle: exceptions on paper may not mean access in practice
A key interpretive claim of the study is policy-focused: rape exceptions in state laws did not guarantee access to abortion for survivors in practice, according to the authors’ assessment that few, if any, of the identified pregnancies resulted in legal in‑state abortions [1] [3]. This conclusion ties the numerical estimate to real-world barriers such as restrictive legal standards, provider hesitancy, and logistical obstacles. Critics do not directly dispute that barriers exist, but they insist that quantifying the scale of unmet need requires careful validation of the underlying pregnancy counts before drawing sweeping access conclusions [2].
5. Timeline matters — study and responses clustered in early 2024
The study and public discussion unfolded in early 2024: the primary estimate was published in January 2024 [1], and critical commentary and author rebuttals appeared by March 2024 [2]. A related PubMed listing and an author response cycle also date to January–March 2024, showing rapid engagement between researchers and critics [3]. The proximity of critiques to the study’s publication indicates contemporaneous scrutiny but does not resolve substantive disputes over data inputs and assumptions [2] [3].
6. What the documents agree on and what remains unsettled
Across the materials, there is consensus that rape-related pregnancies occur and that legal and practical barriers affect survivors’ access to abortion, especially in states with bans [1] [3]. Disagreement centers on magnitude and calculation: whether the 64,565 figure accurately reflects pregnancies attributable to rape in the specified states and period, or whether methodological choices and possible errors meaningfully overstate the count [2]. The authors’ defense asserts robustness; critics demand transparent reanalysis and reconciliation with other sources of assault and pregnancy data [3] [2].
7. Bottom line: a best-available estimate with important caveats
The documents collectively present 64,565 as the best-communicated estimate from the study for rape-related pregnancies in the 14 states with total bans [1], accompanied by the authors’ interpretation that exceptions did not ensure access [3]. However, this figure is contested by commentators who point to potential calculation errors and alternative data interpretations, and the exchange underscores that the estimate should be treated as subject to revision pending further transparent analyses reconciled with official assault reporting datasets [2].