Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How much does the US spend annually on healthcare for undocumented immigrants?
Executive summary
A cluster of peer-reviewed and policy analyses dating largely to 2005–2006, with a 2018 systematic review of immigrant healthcare use, converge on the finding that undocumented immigrants account for a modest share of U.S. health-care spending, estimated at roughly $6.4 billion in total annual expenditures in the mid-2000s, with about $1.1 billion (17%) borne by public sources [1]. The broader literature also consistently reports lower per-capita healthcare spending among immigrants—often half to two-thirds that of U.S.-born residents—highlighting both lower utilization and lower public insurer use [2].
1. Why the $6.4 billion estimate became a headline: a single extrapolation with wide reach
A 2005–2006 analytic line traces back to an estimate that undocumented immigrants’ total U.S. healthcare spending was about $6.4 billion, derived by extrapolating Los Angeles County utilization patterns to the national nonelderly population and adjusting for the undocumented share [3] [1]. The method relied on localized spending shares—foreign-born adults were 33 percent of LA County spending in 2000 and undocumented were 12 percent of the nonelderly adult population yet accounted for 6 percent of spending—then scaled to national totals. This extrapolation is transparent but dated, and its national projection rests on the assumption that LA utilization patterns mirrored those nationwide [3].
2. The public cost figure — $1.1 billion — and what it actually captures
Analysts reported that only 17 percent of the $6.4 billion—about $1.1 billion—was paid by public sources, a framing used to argue that the taxpayer burden from undocumented immigrants’ healthcare was small [1]. That public-share figure combines direct public insurance spending and other government payments captured in the original study’s accounting. Important caveats include the time frame (mid-2000s), the exclusion of longer-term costs and indirect public expenditures, and the dependency on the extrapolation method, which limits precise current applicability [1].
3. A broader literature picture: immigrants spend less per person than U.S.-born residents
A 2018 systematic review synthesizing 188 peer-reviewed studies concluded that immigrants’ overall expenditures are roughly one-half to two-thirds those of U.S.-born individuals, with lower per-capita expenditures from both private and public insurers and higher out-of-pocket shares for immigrants—trends particularly pronounced for undocumented populations [2]. This body of research reinforces the earlier single-study finding by situating it within a pattern of consistently lower utilization and insurance coverage among immigrant groups, which drives lower spending totals per person [2].
4. What the different studies agree on — and where they diverge
Across the cited analyses, there is agreement that undocumented immigrants contribute less to public health spending per capita and are associated with a relatively small share of aggregate U.S. healthcare expenditures [1] [2]. They diverge on methodological breadth and age: the $6.4 billion national estimate depends on a mid-2000s LA-to-U.S. extrapolation [3], whereas the 2018 review aggregates many designs and years to show a robust pattern of lower spending but does not produce a single national dollar figure for undocumented care [2]. That divergence highlights the gap between pattern-based conclusions and single-dollar national estimates.
5. Political interpretations and observable agendas in how figures are used
The $6.4 billion and $1.1 billion numbers have been invoked in political debate to argue that undocumented immigrants impose a small fiscal burden on healthcare systems [1]. Conversely, critics could point to limitations—dated data, regional extrapolation, and omission of indirect or emergency-care costs—to argue the public burden may be underestimated. Both uses reflect agendas: one emphasizes fiscal minimalism to resist restrictive policy, while the other highlights methodological uncertainty to justify caution about generalizing the numbers [3] [2].
6. What’s missing and why recent data matter for policy
All available analyses here are either mid-2000s estimates or syntheses through 2018; none provide a current national dollar figure for undocumented healthcare spending after nearly two decades of demographic, policy, and healthcare-system changes [1] [3] [2]. Key missing elements include updated counts of undocumented populations, contemporary utilization patterns post-Affordable Care Act, state-level policy shifts on emergency and public health coverage, and pandemic-era care effects. Those gaps mean the $6.4 billion/$1.1 billion numbers should be treated as historical benchmarks rather than precise current fiscal measures.
7. Bottom line for readers and policymakers seeking accurate fiscal estimates
The best-supported, consistently replicated finding across studies is that immigrants, and particularly undocumented immigrants, have lower per-capita healthcare spending and rely less on public insurance, and the mid-2000s extrapolation placed total undocumented spending at about $6.4 billion with $1.1 billion publicly financed [1] [2] [3]. Policymakers need updated, nationally representative analyses before using those dollar figures as current policy inputs, because the existing numbers reflect limited geographic extrapolation and older baseline data [1] [2].