Has the VA updated priority groups in the last five years?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Veterans Affairs enrollment system of eight Priority Groups remains intact, but Congress and VA have modified who falls into higher groups in the last five years — most notably through the Honoring Our PACT Act, which moved many veterans exposed to toxic substances into higher-priority categories and prompted changes in enrollment for some previously closed subgroups [1]. The VA’s official pages continue to describe the 1–8 structure and current eligibility criteria, and public analyses (Congressional Budget Office) document the PACT Act’s reclassification effect and limited reopening of Priority Group 8 for some veterans [2] [1].
1. What “updated” means in this context: law, rules, or labels
“Updated” can mean three different things: a statutory change from Congress, a VA regulatory or policy change, or merely revised public guidance or website text; the clearest change in the last five years is legislative — the PACT Act (Public Law 117-168) altered which veterans are treated as higher priority because it recognized toxic-exposure conditions and shifted many affected veterans into higher priority groups (CBO analysis documenting the law’s effect) [1]. The VA website still presents the eight enrollment Priority Groups as the operative framework used to assign veterans to care and to determine copays and eligibility, which indicates there was not a wholesale renumbering or elimination of the 1–8 system during this period [2].
2. The PACT Act: the concrete reclassification that matters
The Congressional Budget Office explicitly ties the most consequential recent changes to the Honoring Our PACT Act, explaining that it “moved veterans deemed to have been exposed to toxic substances to higher priority groups,” an action that reduces barriers to enrollment for many exposed veterans and alters the composition of enrollment across groups [1]. That shift is a substantive update: it changed which medical conditions and exposure histories the VA treats as sufficiently service-related to justify placement in higher-priority categories, and CBO used that change to project enrollment and budgetary impacts [1].
3. Administrative moves: reopening and subpriority tweaks
Separate from the PACT Act’s reclassification, analysts note that VA’s enrollment policy around Priority Group 8 — which the VA had effectively closed to new enrollees in some subcategories back in 2003 — has been partially reopened for some veterans over time; the CBO explicitly says enrollment in group 8 “has been reopened to some veterans,” reflecting discrete administrative decisions rather than a complete overhaul of the priority numbering [1]. The VA’s own eligibility pages and copay-rate pages continue to describe subpriority rules for groups like 7 and 8 and eligibility criteria tied to income, service-connected ratings, and special statuses, which shows the agency has maintained the framework while adjusting who qualifies within it [2] [3].
4. What did not happen: no full renumbering or elimination of the eight groups
All authoritative sources examined continue to present Priority Groups as 1 through 8, with the same basic logic (service-connected disability, income, special circumstances) governing assignment; independent explainer pages and VA guidance reiterate this numbering and the operational consequences [2] [4] [5]. Therefore, while membership rules and some administrative reopenings changed, there is no evidence in the cited reporting of a wholesale structural change — the eight-group framework endures [2] [1].
5. Caveats, opposing views, and limits of the record
Most secondary summaries (advocacy or law-firm explainers) emphasize nuance in subpriority categories and note historical shifts such as the 2003 closure of portions of Group 8 and later partial reopenings, but these sources are explanatory rather than primary legal texts and sometimes predate PACT Act implementation [6] [7]. The CBO provides the clearest, contemporaneous federal accounting of the PACT Act’s effects [1]. The sources supplied do not contain a complete catalogue of every VA regulatory amendment since 2020, so reporting here cannot assert the absence of narrower administrative rule changes not publicly summarized by VA or CBO; it can only confirm that the major, documented update in the last five years is the reclassification driven by the PACT Act and that VA has reopened enrollment to some Group 8 veterans [1] [2].