How can a pet owner verify third‑party lab testing for a cat supplement?

Checked on January 11, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A practical verification strategy for third‑party lab testing of a cat supplement is to follow documentary breadcrumbs: look for recognized certification marks (NASC, NSF/USP), obtain and inspect lot‑specific Certificates of Analysis (CoAs) from the brand, confirm the testing laboratory’s accreditation and methods, and cross‑check independent testing or watchdog reports; these steps reduce but do not eliminate risk because industry inconsistencies have been documented [1] [2] [3].

1. Look for credible seals and organized industry audits

The fastest signal is a recognized quality seal: the National Animal Supplement Council’s yellow Quality Seal identifies suppliers that pass a comprehensive third‑party audit and maintain ongoing compliance with NASC requirements, including facility audits and independent lab results [1] [4], while consumer‑facing marks such as NSF or USP are also used in human supplements and indicate additional third‑party verification pathways [5] [2].

2. Demand a lot‑specific Certificate of Analysis (CoA)

A trustworthy manufacturer will provide a lot‑specific CoA showing which tests were run, the numerical results for potency and contaminants, the lot number, and the testing date; independent labs and testing vendors routinely produce this documentation and it’s the primary proof that a given bottle was actually analyzed [6] [7] [8].

3. Vet the lab: accreditation, methods and public reputation

Verify the named laboratory on the CoA—reputable pet‑food and supplement labs such as Eurofins, Beaconpoint, Mérieux NutriSciences and IEH advertise pet‑food capabilities and advanced instrumentation (ICP‑MS, HPLC, LC‑MS‑MS) that can detect heavy metals, verify ingredient identity, and quantify actives; confirm the lab’s ISO accreditation or participation in proficiency/ring‑test programs to reduce the risk of false results [9] [10] [11] [12] [13].

4. Check that the tests match the risks and label claims

Different analyses serve different purposes—potency assays (HPLC/LC‑MS) confirm active ingredient amounts, ICP‑MS or similar tests detect heavy metals, and microbiological assays identify pathogens—so a CoA should show tests appropriate to the product’s claims (e.g., vitamin levels, guaranteed analysis, contaminants); when a product claims specific ingredient amounts, look for matching assay types on the CoA [10] [13] [6].

5. Cross‑reference independent watchdogs and past failures

Independent testers have uncovered label failures in pet multis—ConsumerLab found numerous products with far less (or more) of listed vitamins or minerals than claimed—so a lack of CoA or opaque sourcing is a red flag and past consumer testing should be consulted where available [3].

6. Watch for transparency signals and common red flags

Good signs are transparent lot lookup tools, easily downloadable CoAs, and explicit statements about testing frequency and scope; bad signs include generic “third‑party tested” claims without a lab name, no lot reference, or refusal to provide a CoA (check services like CheckMySupps for the model of lot‑lookup transparency) [8] [7].

7. Practical checklist and escalation

If the CoA is provided, confirm the lot matches the purchase, that the lab is named and accredited, the methods listed are appropriate for the claims, and key contaminants were tested; if a brand refuses to provide a CoA, cites nondisclosure agreements as the full explanation for opacity, or names an obscure/unaccredited lab, treat the product with caution and report concerns to a veterinarian or consumer watchdog [14] [7] [6].

8. Acknowledge limitations and balance

Even rigorous third‑party testing reduces uncertainty rather than eliminating it: certification programs and labs improve confidence but do not guarantee perfect products, and industry oversight for supplements is not premarket the way pharmaceuticals are, so combine documentation checks with clinical guidance from a veterinarian when deciding whether to use a supplement for a cat [6] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What do NASC Quality Seal audits cover and how often are they performed?
How can a veterinarian interpret a Certificate of Analysis for a pet supplement?
Which accredited labs publish searchable databases of tested pet supplements?