What is Memory Lift and who developed it
Executive summary
Memory Lift appears in 2025–2026 as a consumer-facing “brain” product line sold as either a browser-based memory-training program (by Steel Trap Labs LLC) and a separate dietary nootropics supplement marketed under the same name; the program site disclaims it does not treat dementia and is run by Steel Trap Labs LLC [1], while press releases and reviews describe a Memory Lift supplement launched in mid–2025 and promoted as a nootropic developed through nutritional research [2] [3]. Reporting on the supplement is dominated by marketing, user testimonials, and review articles rather than independent clinical trials [3] [4] [5].
1. Two different products share the Memory Lift name
Memory Lift is not a single, clearly defined scientific product in the available reporting. One Memory Lift is a web-based program that “runs entirely in your browser” and is explicitly operated by Steel Trap Labs LLC; that site includes a disclaimer that its tools are designed to support everyday memory skills and do not claim to prevent, treat, or mitigate dementia or other cognitive conditions [1]. Separately, press releases and commercial newswire stories describe a Memory Lift dietary supplement — a “brain productivity nootropics supplement” or “Memory Lift Supplement” — launched in 2025 and promoted as a natural cognitive-support formula [3] [2].
2. Who developed the web-based Memory Lift
The web-based training product identifies Steel Trap Labs LLC as the operator and party making the explicit medical-disclaimer about the program’s intended use and limitations; that is the developer/owner named on the program site [1]. Available sources do not mention individual founders or researchers by name for the Steel Trap Labs product [1].
3. Who developed the Memory Lift supplement
Marketing materials and press releases present the supplement as “scientifically developed” through nutritional science research and manufactured to high standards, but they do not identify an independent academic research group or peer‑reviewed clinical trial as the developer; instead the supplement is introduced via GlobeNewswire releases and third‑party review sites that repeat company claims of a formulated, plant‑based nootropic blend [3] [2] [4]. Available sources do not name a single lead scientist, academic lab, or regulatory filing that would independently verify the supplement’s development history [3] [2].
4. Marketing, testimonials and review coverage dominate the public record
Most of the documents and pages in the search results are promotional: company websites, press releases via GlobeNewswire, commercial reviews, and user testimonial pages hosted on marketing platforms or S3 buckets [6] [7] [8] [3]. Review sites and newswire summaries emphasize user-reported timelines (e.g., claims of initial focus improvements in 1–4 weeks and more pronounced memory benefits by 8–12 weeks) and retail advice (buy from the official site), but these are company claims or secondary reporting rather than independent clinical evidence [3] [4] [9].
5. What the companies explicitly concede
The web program’s site contains a prominent disclaimer: Memory Lift and Steel Trap Labs LLC do not claim their programs prevent, treat, or mitigate dementia or other cognitive conditions; they present their tools as “research-informed training strategies” to support everyday memory skills [1]. Press releases for the supplement assert natural-ingredient formulations and manufacturing standards but do not appear to reference FDA evaluation or published clinical trials supporting efficacy [2] [3].
6. Independent verification and gaps in reporting
Independent, peer‑reviewed clinical evidence, named scientists, or regulatory assessments for either the Steel Trap Labs training program or the supplement are not present in the search results. Review coverage flags typical market‑place caveats — potential counterfeit concerns, mixed user feedback, and the broader competitive nootropics market — but these pieces are themselves commercial or aggregator reporting rather than academic validation [4] [5] [9]. Available sources do not mention randomized controlled trials or specific academic institutions validating either product [1] [3] [2].
7. How to read these materials critically
Consumers should treat claims found in GlobeNewswire releases, company sites, and paid review pages as marketing unless backed by named, peer‑reviewed studies or regulatory filings; the training program’s own legal language explicitly limits medical claims [1]. Independent sources and clinical trial registries are not cited in the provided materials, so buyers and journalists should seek named studies, third‑party lab reports, or regulatory documentation before accepting therapeutic claims [3] [2].
If you want, I can search specifically for peer‑reviewed trials, regulatory records, or named developers beyond the company and press‑release level and summarize any independent evidence or lack thereof.