Where can a verified GaraHerb Supplement Facts label or Certificate of Analysis be obtained?
Executive summary
GaraHerb products are sold through multiple brand sites and marketplaces that advertise supplement benefits and manufacturing claims, but reporting shows the public-facing pages frequently omit a full Supplement Facts panel or a posted Certificate of Analysis (COA) for independent verification [1] [2] [3] [4]. The most reliable places to look for a verified Supplement Facts label or COA are official product packaging, regulated label databases, or direct documentation from the manufacturer or independent labs — however, the sources examined do not show a published COA and explicitly note absent or incomplete label disclosures online [4] [5].
1. Where the brand publishes product information — inconsistent transparency
Multiple GaraHerb-branded sites and sales pages list product claims and guarantees — for example garaherb.ca, garaherb.com and a site claiming FDA-registered, GMP-certified facilities — but those pages either do not display a complete Supplement Facts panel on their main landing pages or provide marketing copy rather than a full ingredient/amount breakdown [1] [3] [2] [4]. Independent reporting flagged that the brand’s main landing page “does not display a complete ingredient panel or supplement facts label,” and the reporter explicitly stated they could not confirm exact ingredients or amounts without seeing the product label [4].
2. Marketplace listings and customer uploads can hold a label — verify provenance
Third‑party listings sometimes include product images and a nutrition or supplement facts label; for example, an eBay listing for a GaraHerb product advertises a “Nutrition Facts Label” in the item description and shows product attributes in the listing [6]. Such listings can be a source of label imagery, but marketplace photos do not substitute for a manufacturer‑issued label or an independent COA and may reflect reseller-created assets rather than original manufacturer documentation [6].
3. Government and public label databases — the authoritative public registry to check
The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements maintains the Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD), which catalogs label information for dietary supplements sold in the United States and can be used to confirm what appears on a product’s printed label when a product is included in the database [5]. The DSLD is explicitly designed to host “all information printed on labels of dietary supplement products sold in the United States” and is a recognized public resource for label verification [5]. If GaraHerb’s exact product label is in the DSLD, the Supplement Facts panel found there would be a verified public record [5].
4. Certificates of Analysis (COAs) and third‑party testing — not publicly located in reporting
None of the sources reviewed contained a published Certificate of Analysis for GaraHerb or an independently posted third‑party lab report; Access Newswire’s independent analysis cautioned that the exact ingredients and amounts could not be confirmed without seeing the product label, and the reporter could not verify ingredient amounts [4]. Manufacturer claims about production in FDA‑registered or GMP facilities appear on marketing sites but are not the same as a COA, and the reports examined do not include a downloadable COA [2] [4].
5. Customer reviews, skepticism, and DIY label tools — complicating the picture
User reviews and complaint pages note missing ingredient information and marketplace proliferation that raises questions about authenticity and consistency across sellers [7] [8]. Meanwhile, available label‑creation tools and templates make it simple for third parties to generate Supplement Facts art, which means an image of a label found online should be corroborated against official packaging, a DSLD record, or a manufacturer/third‑party lab statement before being treated as authoritative [9] [10].
Conclusion — where to obtain a verified label or COA based on available reporting
The clearest verified sources, per the reporting, are: the product’s physical packaging (photos posted by the manufacturer or retailer may suffice if provenance is clear) and the NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database if the product is listed there [5] [6]. There is no published COA in the materials reviewed — reporting specifically notes the inability to confirm label details online [4] — so locating a COA would require contacting the brand through its support or purchase channels (the brand’s sites provide contact/return links) and requesting an independent lab report, or seeking documentation from the seller if buying through a marketplace [3] [6]. The available sources document marketing claims and reviewer skepticism but do not provide a posted, independently verifiable COA for GaraHerb [2] [7] [4].