Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which country has smallest dick average
Executive summary
Public compilations of “average penis size by country” consistently place Southeast and East Asian countries among those with the smallest reported averages—examples often cited are Cambodia (~10 cm / under 4 in), Thailand (~9.4–9.5 cm in some datasets), Myanmar/Burma and the Philippines—while Ecuador frequently appears at the top (~17.6 cm) [1] [2] [3]. All major aggregations warn that the underlying data are patchy, often self‑reported, and vary in sample size and measurement methods, so international rankings should be treated as illustrative, not definitive [4] [2] [5].
1. What the headline rankings say — Cambodia, Thailand and other “smallest” labels
Multiple recent maps and lists compiled from prior studies and aggregated datasets identify Cambodia among the countries with the smallest reported erect averages (around 10 cm / ~3.9 in), and place other Southeast/East Asian countries (Thailand, Myanmar, Philippines, Laos, North Korea in some maps) at the lower end of the scale [1] [3] [6]. Some specific compilations give Thailand as the absolute smallest in certain datasets with figures as low as about 9.43 cm (3.71 in), while others put Cambodia at the bottom near 10.0 cm [2] [1].
2. Why different sources disagree — data, methods and sample sizes
Compilers rely on a mix of published studies, clinical measurements and self‑reported responses; sample sizes range from a few dozen to thousands across countries, and some datasets explicitly exclude self‑reports while others depend on them. Those methodological differences produce divergent country rankings and mean values [4] [2] [5]. The aggregators themselves caution the data are “unreliable” for definitive cross‑country claims because of these inconsistencies [4].
3. Self‑reporting and measurement bias — the most important limitation
Several sources and clinic‑led surveys note self‑reported measurements are common and often biased upward, while studies that use clinical measurement are more limited in geographic coverage; this inflates uncertainty in country means and relative rankings [4] [7] [8]. VisualCapitalist and other analysts explicitly warn environmental, genetic and methodological factors all influence results and that some countries’ averages may not reflect national populations accurately [5].
4. The regional pattern — East/Southeast Asia vs South America/Africa
Across multiple compilations, a consistent pattern emerges: South America and parts of Africa tend to report higher averages, while East and Southeast Asia report lower averages. But authors stress these differences are “mild overall” relative to common assumptions and still fall within medically normal ranges [2] [4] [5].
5. The role of authoritative studies and how they’re used
Many maps and rankings lean on an influential 2014 pooled analysis (Veale et al. and related literature) and later syntheses; aggregators like Data Pandas, WorldData and World Population Review combine those studies with additional national data to build country lists, often without new standardized measurement across countries [4] [2] [5]. That means rankings reflect which underlying studies each aggregator chose and how they weighted them.
6. What journalists and clinicians caution readers to remember
Coverage from outlets that republish rankings (Daily Mail, national press) frequently includes caveats: measurements were sometimes self‑reported, sample sizes vary, and cross‑national comparisons are fraught; those outlets still publish rankings because the topic draws public interest [6] [9] [1]. Clinical summaries likewise remind readers that penis size does not correlate with fertility or necessarily with sexual satisfaction for partners [4] [10].
7. How you should interpret the single question “Which country has the smallest average?”
Available reporting often names Cambodia, Thailand or neighboring countries as the smallest depending on the dataset used [1] [2] [3]. But because findings vary by source and suffer methodological limits, a confident, definitive claim that “Country X has the smallest penis average” is not supported uniformly across the available compilations — the evidence is mixed and sensitive to which dataset an analyst uses [4] [2] [5].
8. Practical takeaway and recommended caution
If you need a quick answer for general interest, cite the aggregator and its figure (for example: “Cambodia ≈10 cm in some datasets” or “Thailand ≈9.4 cm in another”), and include the methodological caveat that many figures are derived from mixed sources and may rely on self‑reporting [1] [2] [4]. For any scientific, medical or policy use, seek primary peer‑reviewed studies with transparent measurement protocols rather than headline rankings [4] [2].
Note: This summary is based solely on the cited public rankings and reporting compiled by Data Pandas, WorldData, World Population Review and press coverage; available sources do not provide a single universally agreed‑upon country with the absolute smallest medically measured average [4] [2] [5].