Who manufactures Neurocept and where is the company located?

1. Conflicting corporate names and the “made in USA” message that sells trust

Official product pages present Neurocept as manufactured in the United States, but they stop short of naming a manufacturer, which leaves a transparency gap between production claims and corporate identity. The site indicates the product is made in the USA and lists ClickBank as the retailer, which implies a retail-distribution relationship rather than manufacturing disclosure. Independent summaries identify a company called Neurocept Inc. in San Luis Obispo and a Neurocept LLC address in Baton Rouge, but these appear in different sources and contexts, suggesting that multiple entities are associated with the brand across marketing, sales, and corporate registration rather than showing a single manufacturer accountable for production details ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. Retailers and marketplace sellers muddy the provenance trail

Market listings and platform sellers introduce further ambiguity: Neurocept appears on Amazon under a seller named Syvor and on eBay via Blaze River Market, while the official funnel uses ClickBank as a payment and retail intermediary. These multiple distribution channels make it difficult to trace who actually controls manufacturing, who supplies bottles, and who is responsible for labeling accuracy. The presence of marketplace sellers who list addresses in California and other states raises the possibility that some listings reflect resellers or fulfillment addresses rather than the physical manufacturer, complicating consumer attempts to verify origin and corporate responsibility ^{[5] [6] [1]}.

3. Consumer reviews and trust reports point to practical transparency issues

Trustpilot and user reports raise concerns about product authenticity, inconsistent ingredients, and customer service failures, which are symptoms commonly linked to opaque supply chains and multiple intermediaries. One source recounts reviewer claims and lists addresses tied to Neurocept LLC and another company, but it remains unclear whether those addresses are manufacturing sites or administrative locations. These complaints underscore a practical truth: when corporate and manufacturing roles are blurred across LLCs, retailers, and marketplaces, consumers face elevated risk of mislabeling and poor recourse, even if the product is nominally “made in the USA” ^{[4] [1]}.

4. Startup filings and directory entries versus the official product narrative

An older business profile identifies Neurocept Inc. as a startup in San Luis Obispo with a nootropic focus, which would align logically with a manufacturer profile, but the company’s public footprint on product pages remains limited. The product’s official pages emphasize ingredients and usage while directing sales through ClickBank and providing a Delaware corporation address for legal/retail purposes, which may be standard e-commerce practice. The result is a split between corporate registration, retail operations, and claimed manufacturing origin, leaving unresolved whether the San Luis Obispo entity, the Baton Rouge LLC, or a contract manufacturer actually produces Neurocept capsules ^{[3] [1]}.

5. What a consumer or regulator should look for next

To resolve the question definitively, one should request a Certificate of Manufacturing, GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) documentation, or a finished-goods COA (Certificate of Analysis) showing the name and address of the manufacturing facility; absence of those documents supports the pattern of incomplete disclosure seen across sources. Consumers seeking accountability should also examine ClickBank sales records and any Delaware corporate disclosure on the official funnel for legal contact points, while regulators would expect clear labeling of the manufacturer and manufacturing address on product packaging per supplement rules. The current evidence shows mixed corporate names and distributor roles but no single, consistently cited manufacturing company ^{[2] [1]}.