Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What were the main goals of the Four Year Plan introduced by Hitler in 1936?
Executive summary
The Four Year Plan [1] was a Nazi economic program ordered by Adolf Hitler to make Germany ready for war within four years by accelerating rearmament and moving the economy toward autarky/self-sufficiency in strategic materials (rubber, oil substitutes, steel) and a “blockade‑free” war economy; Hitler issued the memorandum in August 1936 and appointed Hermann Göring to implement it in October 1936 [2] [3] [4]. Sources emphasize that its core purpose was preparing Germany for aggressive war and Lebensraum, and it subordinated civilian economic ministries to wartime priorities [5] [6].
1. A plan declared to make Germany “fit for war” in four years
Hitler’s August 1936 memorandum set the Four Year Plan’s headline goal: “the German economy must be fit for war [kriegsfähig] within four years,” meaning a deliberate re‑orientation of industry and resources toward armaments and military preparedness [3] [5]. Historians and primary documents framed the plan explicitly as preparation for conflict rather than as ordinary peacetime economic policy [5] [6].
2. Reich control and Göring’s sweeping authority
To carry out those aims Hitler appointed Hermann Göring as Reich Plenipotentiary/Commissioner of the Four Year Plan (October 1936), giving him powers that cut across and often bypassed the Ministry of Economics and the Reichsbank—weakening Hjalmar Schacht and consolidating political control over economic priorities [5] [2] [7].
3. Autarky and a “blockade‑free” economy
A central, repeatedly stated objective was autarky—making Germany self‑sufficient in strategic war materials so it could withstand naval blockades or embargoes. That included substituting imports with domestic production (synthetic rubber, synthetic fuel, chemicals, aluminum) and expanding raw‑material extraction and heavy industry [4] [6] [3].
4. Accelerated rearmament and resource prioritization
The plan prioritized rearmament and redirected large shares of industrial investment into military‑relevant sectors: between 1936 and 1939 nearly two‑thirds of industrial investment went into Four Year Plan projects, and military spending rose sharply as a result [4]. The program deliberately subordinated consumer‑oriented economic aims to military needs [5] [8].
5. Economic instruments: synthetic production, infrastructure, and agriculture
Implementation relied on state‑directed investments: synthetic fuel and rubber plants, chemical industries, expanded iron and aluminum production, plus public works and agricultural measures intended to reduce import dependence [4] [9]. The Four Year Plan also connected to other Nazi agencies (e.g., Organisation Todt) to coordinate construction and armaments [2].
6. Political motives: Lebensraum and a preparatory timetable for aggression
Sources link the Four Year Plan to Hitler’s ideological objective of Lebensraum (living space in the East) and his expectation of a coming showdown with the Soviet Union; the economic program was explicitly designed to prepare Germany materially and organizationally for territorial conquest [5] [6]. Contemporary records record Hitler’s apocalyptic framing in 1936 and Göring’s argument that war with the USSR was inevitable [2] [6].
7. Internal opposition and bureaucratic consequences
The Four Year Plan deepened conflicts inside the regime: Hjalmar Schacht and other “free market” ministers opposed the shift toward full‑scale rearmament and autarky; after Hitler sided with Göring, Schacht was marginalized and resigned [2] [5] [7]. The appointment of Göring reflected a political choice to replace technical economic management with political control aligned to Hitler’s war aims [7].
8. Results and limits noted by sources
Sources agree the plan greatly expanded investment in war‑relevant industries and created a wartime economic orientation, but they also point to practical limitations—implementation problems, delays, and the fact that many goals (in particular full autarky) were never fully achieved before war broke out [4] [8]. Available sources do not provide a single unified metric of “success,” but they emphasize the plan’s decisive role in converting Germany into a war economy [4] [10].
9. Why historians treat the plan as evidence of intent to wage aggressive war
Contemporary memoranda, cabinet minutes, and later Allied analyses treat the Four Year Plan as concrete evidence that Nazi leaders planned for and organized the economy for aggressive war—seeking self‑sufficiency in rubber, gasoline, and steel and organizing industry to withstand blockades are cited repeatedly as preparatory measures for expansionist warfare [6] [2].
Limitations: This summary is drawn from the provided sources; additional archival scholarship would add further quantitative detail on spending, production targets, and the plan’s internal memoranda—available sources do not mention every specific production target or the full roster of implementing agencies beyond those cited above [4] [3].