Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How many Nazis emigrated to South America in the 1940’s?
Executive summary
Estimates of how many Nazis fled to South America after World War II vary widely; several sources cite figures up to about 9,000 people spirited out of Europe, with specific allocations such as “as many as 5,000” to Argentina, up to 2,000 to Brazil and about 1,000 to Chile in some accounts [1] [2] [3]. Reporting and scholarship emphasize uncertainty: published tallies are often rough estimates based on postwar intelligence, press reports and later historical inquiry rather than precise migration records [1] [4].
1. The headline numbers and where they come from
Popular and secondary accounts frequently repeat a rounded “up to 9,000” figure for Nazis and collaborators who reached South America, and some break that total down into roughly 5,000 to Argentina, 2,000 to Brazil and 1,000 to Chile [1] [2] [3]. These figures appear in synthesis pieces, library exhibits and media narratives rather than as the result of a single archival census; the 9,000 number is described as “by some counts” and is echoed across outlets that summarize ratline activity [2] [1].
2. Why the totals are disputed and inherently uncertain
Historians note several reasons for the range: incomplete or destroyed records, clandestine escape routes (“ratlines”), forged travel documents, and assistance from sympathetic governments, clergy and émigré networks that concealed arrivals [1] [5]. The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and research workshops emphasize that many non-Jewish refugees and lesser-known perpetrators also migrated, complicating attempts to isolate a definitive count of “Nazis” among postwar migrants [4] [6].
3. Multiple estimates in scholarly and media accounts
Different researchers and institutions provide different scales: German prosecutors cited in media have offered counsels ranging from a few thousand to the larger 9,000 tally; other commentators suggest figures like 1,500–2,000 to Brazil and 5,000 to Argentina [3] [1]. The variety reflects different emphases — some count all former Nazi Party members and collaborators, others focus on those later identified as war criminals or senior SS personnel [1] [3].
4. Routes, actors and mechanisms that produced the flows
Escape routes ran through Spain, Italy (Rome/Genoa) and via networks of clergy, émigré communities and sometimes corrupt officials who issued visas or shelter [1] [5] [7]. Argentina under Juan Perón is centrally featured in accounts as a major destination that accepted many fugitives; Catholic clergy such as Alois Hudal and local prelates have been implicated in providing assistance [1] [5] [7].
5. Notable cases that shaped public perception
High-profile fugitives — Adolf Eichmann, Josef Mengele, Franz Stangl and Klaus Barbie among others — dramatized the phenomenon and helped solidify the image of South America as a refuge, even though these individuals represent a small, attention-grabbing subset of arrivals [8] [7]. Publicity around these captures and trials influenced later efforts to quantify and investigate the larger flows [8].
6. Alternative perspectives and methodological caveats
Some sources and historians urge caution: counting “Nazis” can mean very different things (senior war criminals versus lower-level party members versus ethnic German émigrés), and broad figures may mix voluntary migrants, refugees and clandestine fugitives [4] [6]. The Wiener Holocaust Library notes that Latin America was a destination for many types of European exiles in the 1930s–40s, which complicates attributing all postwar arrivals to organized escapes [9].
7. What the sources don’t settle and next steps for serious inquiry
Available sources do not contain a single authoritative, archival-derived tally that definitively counts those who reached South America; claims of “about 9,000” are repeated estimates rather than hard totals [1] [2]. For a more precise picture, the literature recommends archival research in immigration records, diplomatic archives and postwar intelligence files in both European and South American repositories — work that several historians and prosecutors have pursued but which remains partial [6] [3].
Conclusion: Use estimates but flag uncertainty — the widely cited “up to 9,000” figure and country-by-country breakdowns (e.g., ~5,000 to Argentina) are useful shorthand drawn from mid‑20th-century intelligence and later historical summaries, but they are not definitive counts and should be presented as estimates supported by the cited reporting [1] [2] [3].