How have primary sources (Arabic radio broadcasts, government orders, eyewitness testimonies) been interpreted regarding calls for evacuation in 1948?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Scholars and primary‑source analysts disagree sharply about whether Arabic radio broadcasts or Arab leaders issued widespread evacuation orders in 1948: Erskine Childers’ review of radio transcripts found “not a single order, or appeal, or suggestion about evacuation … from any Arab radio station” [1], while other researchers, refugee testimonies and later compilations record examples where Arab officials or local loudspeakers urged civilians to move back from front lines [2] [3]. At the same time, historians including Benny Morris document extensive Haganah Arabic‑language broadcasts urging women and children to leave combat zones and describe psychological‑warfare broadcasts that contributed to flight [4] [5].
1. How radio archives reshaped the debate — “the absence of Arab orders”
Analysts who examined contemporary radio transcripts found scant evidence that official Arab stations ordered wholesale evacuation; Erskine Childers’ archival work is cited repeatedly to argue that Arab radio urged populations to remain, and that claims of pan‑Arab evacuation orders are not visible in the preserved broadcasts [1] [6]. Institute for Palestine Studies coverage highlights Childers’ finding that Arab stations “were being urged to remain,” directly contradicting narratives that Arab radios told civilians to leave [6].
2. Counterevidence from testimonies and press — “get away from the front line”
Personal testimonies and press reports present a different picture: refugees have recounted hearing Arab regime radio warnings to “get away from the frontline,” and Palestinian and Israeli compilations cite statements by Arab officials or local loudspeakers instructing temporary moves to neighbouring states or to avoid combat zones [2] [3]. Pro‑Israeli sources and some refugee accounts treat these exhortations as a significant cause of flight in particular localities [2] [7].
3. The Haganah’s broadcasts and psychological warfare — “evacuate the women and children”
Historians document that Jewish military radio and loudspeakers used Arabic broadcasts as psychological warfare. Benny Morris and contemporary summaries report Haganah announcements telling inhabitants to “evacuate the women, the children and the old immediately” and warnings that certain neighbourhoods would be attacked — messages explicitly designed to demoralize and move civilians [8] [4] [5]. Morris concludes these Jewish broadcasts, alongside military attacks and news of massacres, were major drivers of urban and rural flight [4].
4. Local orders, loudspeakers and the fog of war — mixed causes at the village level
Primary sources show variation by place: some villages received loudspeaker warnings or local commander instructions to move non‑combatants for tactical reasons — for example, a loudspeaker is reported in the Deir Yassin episode calling inhabitants to evacuate on the night of the attack [9]. British intelligence and Israeli analyses also found isolated instructions from Arab commanders to move women and children in combat zones, though such communications applied to tactical evacuation rather than centralized, pan‑Arab orders [10].
5. Historiography and political framing — why the same sources support different narratives
The same primary materials have been read differently by competing camps. Early Israeli (Zionist) narratives emphasized Arab or pan‑Arab calls to leave; Arab and Palestinian historians stressed expulsions and Haganah pressure [11]. Later archival work (Childers, Morris) and intelligence records complicated both positions: Childers’ monitored radio transcripts undermine claims of broad Arab‑state evacuation orders [1] [6], while Morris’ archival research documents systematic use of Arabic broadcasts by Jewish forces and finds that many refugees left because of attacks and fear — though he judged direct Arab exhortations significant in only a minority of cases [4] [12].
6. Limitations in the record — what the available sources do and do not show
Available sources do not mention a single unified, pan‑Arab broadcast ordering all Palestinians to flee, and Childers’ radio archive work is taken as strong evidence for that absence [1] [6]. At the same time, multiple testimonies and press items record local exhortations and state‑level advice to avoid front lines — so localized evacuation appeals did occur [2] [3]. The record is strongest on Haganah psychological broadcasts urging evacuation of vulnerable civilians [4] [5]. What remains contested is the scale and causal weight of Arab‑side exhortations versus Jewish military action and fear‑provoking events.
7. Bottom line for readers — nuanced verdict, contested evidence
Primary radio archives and careful transcript analysis weaken the claim of a coordinated Arab radio‑ordered mass evacuation [1] [6]. Yet eyewitness testimony, local loudspeaker incidents, and documented Haganah Arabic broadcasts show a mosaic of drivers — tactical evacuations, psychological warfare by Jewish forces, and some Arab calls to move from front lines — that together produced the large 1948 displacements [4] [2] [9]. Different scholars emphasize different elements depending on which primary sources they privilege [8] [12].