Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What were the leading economies in GDP during 1938?
Executive summary
In 1938 the United States was the world’s largest economy by a wide margin; contemporary reconstructions (University of Warwick datasets summarized by Statista) list the U.S. at the top of annual GDP estimates for 1938, with major European powers and the USSR following [1] [2]. Different historical reconstructions exist (market‑exchange nominal GNPs, 1990 international dollars, or PPP conversions), but the consistent finding in the available reporting is U.S. primacy and a cluster of large economies including Germany, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and France [1] [3] [2].
1. U.S. dominance before the war — the plain numbers
Economic historians compiling pre‑war GDP estimates place the United States clearly first in 1938. Statista cites an annual‑GDP reconstruction based on University of Warwick work that shows the U.S. was “by far” the largest economy in 1938, a finding echoed across the Statista summaries of both total and annual GDP series for the period [1] [2]. Popular summaries and map visualizations likewise emphasize that U.S. GDP exceeded that of any single European or Asian power in 1938 [4].
2. Who followed the U.S.? The usual top contenders
Available reconstructions commonly list Germany, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and France among the largest economies after the United States. One forum compilation of nominal GNPs (presenting current‑dollar figures for 1938) lists the United States first, then Germany, the UK, USSR, and France—followed by Italy and Japan—illustrating the familiar lineup of great‑power economies on the eve of World War II [3]. Statista’s pre‑war charts likewise group the big industrial powers (U.S., USSR, Germany, UK, France, Japan, Italy) among the largest [1] [2].
3. Methodology matters — why rankings can vary
Different research teams use different bases: nominal market‑exchange rates, deflated series in 1939 or 1990 international dollars, or PPP adjustments. The Statista charts summarize University of Warwick estimates expressed in 1990 international dollars, while other reconstructions quoted in forums use current 1938 dollar valuations; some maps use Paul Bairoch’s converted 1960‑dollar series [2] [3] [4]. Those methodological choices change absolute figures and can shuffle lower‑ranked positions, though they do not undercut the overarching point that the U.S. was far ahead of individual rivals [1] [2].
4. Contested boundaries and annexations that affect totals
Territorial changes in 1938 affect country totals reported in some datasets. For example, German figures for that year may include Austria and annexed parts of Czechoslovakia, because those territories were incorporated into Germany before or during 1938; sources that use contemporaneous exchange‑rate conversions note this caveat [3]. Historians warn that comparing states whose borders changed or who controlled colonial empires requires care — empire GDPs and metropolitan GDPs can be reported differently in different datasets (available sources do not mention a consistent empire/metropole split for every country in 1938).
5. Allied vs. Axis comparisons — aggregated power matters
Some analysts aggregate national GDPs to compare coalitions. One reconstruction cited in onwar.com (drawing on Harrison’s work) groups the Allies (USA + UK + France + USSR) and Axis (Germany + Austria + Italy + Japan) to examine material potential; in 1938 Allied totals exceeded Axis totals under that accounting, a metric frequently used to interpret possible war outcomes [5]. These coalition aggregates depend on the particular set of countries included and on whether occupied or annexed territories are counted with the occupying power [5].
6. Limitations, disagreements, and what’s not in the available reporting
Available sources agree on the broad ranking — U.S. first, major European powers and Japan following — but they differ in absolute numbers and in minor rank order depending on currency base and territorial assumptions [1] [3] [2]. The provided sources do not present a single uniform table listing the top ten GDPs in one agreed dollar base; they also do not supply a fully sourced ranking that reconciles empire vs. metropolitan GDP consistently across every country (not found in current reporting). Where sources explicitly note comparability issues (exchange rates, annexations), those caveats must be treated as central to interpreting the data [3] [2].
7. What this means for interpreting 1938 economic power
Takeaway: the United States had the largest industrial and economic capacity entering 1938, while Germany, the UK, the USSR, and France ranked as the other major powers by output in most reconstructions; Italy and Japan were smaller but still significant [1] [3] [2]. Analysts who emphasize coalition‑level potential or wartime mobilization often re‑aggregate these national figures [5]. Any precise headline figure for 1938 GDP depends on which conversion, territorial assumption, and dataset a researcher uses [2].
Sources cited in this summary: Statista summaries of University of Warwick GDP reconstructions (pre‑war and annual 1938 series) and related compilations noting nominal GNPs and coalition aggregates [1] [2] [3] [5] [4].