Was the tartarian empire real
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The question of whether the Tartarian Empire was real has been extensively analyzed by various sources, with the majority concluding that it is a pseudohistorical conspiracy theory [1] [2]. According to these sources, the theory posits the existence of a lost civilization with advanced technology and culture, but there is no historical evidence to support these claims [2] [3]. The term "Tartary" does have historical roots, referring to a region in Asia, including Siberia and parts of central Asia [1] [4], but the concept of a powerful and advanced Tartarian Empire is not supported by factual evidence [5] [3]. Some sources suggest that the theory originated from Russian nationalism and pseudoscience [2], and has been spread through online platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Reddit [5]. The theory has been debunked by excellent YouTubers and historians [5], and is considered a bizarre and debunked idea [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
One key aspect missing from the original statement is the historical context of the term "Tartary" [1] [4], which was used to refer to a region in Asia. Additionally, the role of Russian professor Anatoly Fomenko in popularizing the theory [6] is an important context that is not mentioned in the original statement. Alternative viewpoints, such as the idea that the Tartarian Empire was a real historical entity that has been erased from history [6], are also not considered in the original statement. However, these alternative viewpoints are not supported by factual evidence [2] [3], and are considered speculation and misinformation [3]. Some sources also mention the Mud Flood conspiracy theory, which is related to the Tartarian Empire theory [1], but this context is also missing from the original statement.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be considered misleading because it does not provide any context or evidence to support the existence of the Tartarian Empire [2] [3]. The statement may also be biased towards promoting the conspiracy theory, as it does not consider alternative viewpoints or present a balanced view of the topic [5] [1]. The lack of historical evidence and the debunking of the theory by experts [2] [3] suggest that the original statement may be promoting misinformation. The sources that benefit from this framing are likely those that promote conspiracy theories and pseudoscience [2], while the sources that are harmed by this framing are those that promote factual evidence and historical accuracy [2] [3] [1] [6] [4] [2] [5] [3].