What Latin countries are part of the greater US map designed by technate inc in early to mid 1900s ?

1. What the original sources actually show about “Latin” territory

Contemporary reproductions and catalog records of the 1940 Technate map repeatedly describe the project as including “Central America” and “the Caribbean,” together with partial inclusion of “Columbia, Venezuela, and the Guyanas,” language that appears verbatim in multiple archival descriptions ^{[3] [1] [2]}; catalogs emphasize that the map aimed to create a self-sustaining continental unit stretching from Greenland to the Date Line and, in some accounts, from Panama to the North Pole ^{[3] [4]}.

2. How “Central America” and “the Caribbean” translate to named countries (and where the sources are silent)

The period accounts and catalog descriptions use regional labels—Central America and Caribbean—rather than enumerating individual nation-states, so the Technate’s claimed inclusion necessarily implies the Central American states (for example: Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, and often Belize in modern regional definitions) and Caribbean lands, but the primary sources do not list every island or isthmian polity by name, so asserting a definitive checklist of countries goes beyond what the cited documentation provides ^{[1] [2]}.

3. The explicit South American pieces: Colombia, Venezuela and the Guianas

Multiple institutional descriptions of the map, including Cornell and rare-map dealers, explicitly note that the Technate included “parts of Columbia [sic], Venezuela and the Guyanas,” indicating the map’s designers incorporated only northern fringes of South America into the proposed continental unit rather than claiming the entire continent south of Panama ^{[1] [3] [5]}.

4. Context and intent: why Technocracy drew such broad boundaries

Howard Scott and Technocracy Inc. framed the Technate as a resource- and defense-driven continental unit meant to be “self-sustaining,” advocating consolidation of territories necessary for that economic and strategic vision; the literature and the map stress continental integration and mobilization as a keystone of their program and offer territorial expansion not as colonial annexation per se but as a redefinition of a “North American” geographic-economic area for technocratic governance ^{[6] [1] [4]}.

5. Disagreements, ambiguities and the limits of surviving descriptions

Scholars and rare-map sellers reproduce slightly different phrasings (e.g., “parts of Columbia, Venezuela, and the Guyanas” vs. “Panama to the North Pole”), and secondary commentary fills gaps with reasonable inference about which Central American and Caribbean polities would be implicated; however, none of the provided catalog records or archival descriptions supplies a line-by-line list of every Latin American country included, so any exhaustive enumeration would be an extrapolation beyond the available sources ^{[3] [1] [2] [4]}.

6. What this means for answering the question directly

Based on the contemporary map descriptions and archival records, the Latin countries encompassed by Technocracy Inc.’s “greater US” or Technate concept are described at the regional level as Central America and the Caribbean, plus partial inclusion of northern South American territories — specifically Colombia, Venezuela and the Guianas — while Canada and Greenland were also folded into the larger technate design ^{[1] [3] [4]}; the sources do not provide a definitive list of every Caribbean island or Central American polity, so this answer sticks to what the primary descriptions explicitly state ^{[2] [5]}.