Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What are the top 5 countries of origin for illegal immigrants arrested in the US in 2025?

Checked on October 28, 2025
Searched for:
"Top 5 countries of origin for illegal immigrants arrested in the US in 2025"
"ICE and CBP arrest data 2025"
"DHS fiscal year 2025 illegal border crossers country breakdown"
Found 9 sources

Executive Summary: The available reporting and datasets cited in the provided analyses do not offer a single definitive public list titled “top 5 countries of origin for illegal immigrants arrested in the U.S. in 2025,” but the most direct arrest counts published by ICE identify Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and Nicaragua as the leading countries by citizenship among those arrested in ICE operations during 2025, with specific tallies reported for each [1]. Other public analyses and summaries note broader trends—rising overall unauthorized population and shifting enforcement priorities—while several pieces emphasize that published arrest tallies reflect ICE-defined citizenship categories and enforcement focus rather than a comprehensive account of all crossings or every agency’s arrests [2] [3] [4] [5].

1. Why one ICE table dominates the “top five” claim and what it actually measures

ICE’s enforcement tallies are the clearest source cited for country-level arrest counts: the data list Mexico (11,586 arrests), Guatemala [6] [7], Honduras [6] [8], El Salvador [9] [10], and Nicaragua [9] [11] as the most frequent citizenships among people arrested by ICE in 2025, creating the basis for the “top five” claim [1]. Those ICE figures cover arrests executed by ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations, not total border apprehensions by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) or encounters reported by other agencies, which means the list represents ICE’s operational caseload and removals pipeline rather than an exhaustive measure of all unauthorized entries or attempts. Analysts caution that agency-specific arrest data can reflect targeting priorities, geography of operations, and processing practices, so the ICE “top five” is authoritative for ICE arrests but not automatically equivalent to total illegal-entry origins [5].

2. Conflicting or absent data across other summaries complicates a simple ranking

Multiple summaries and quick-facts notes examined do not reproduce a consistent top-five list, instead offering broader context about detention numbers, removals, and overall unauthorized-population trends without matching the ICE citizenship breakdown [2] [4] [12]. The Pew Research Center materials and other overviews emphasize the scale of the unauthorized population (about 14 million in 2023) and long-term migration patterns rather than arrest-level country rankings, leaving a gap between population estimates and enforcement-specific arrest tallies [3]. This divergence matters because population shares and arrest frequencies can diverge sharply when enforcement concentrates in particular regions or targets categories like recent crossers, criminal aliens, or immigration violators who happen to be citizens of specific countries [2] [4].

3. Political context and enforcement changes shape the arrest picture and should be flagged

Reporting contemporaneous to late 2025 highlights an enforcement shift under the then-current administration: increased emphasis on deportation targets, leadership changes at ICE, and policy steps intended to boost removals and arrests [13]. Coverage tying decreases in border encounters to tougher asylum rules and detention policies underscores that policy choices can rapidly reshape both who is arrested and how many arrests occur, which in turn affects country-of-origin tallies in a given year [14] [15]. Observers should treat headline arrest rankings as sensitive to political agendas: administrations favoring stricter enforcement will produce different arrest compositions than those prioritizing alternatives to detention or different enforcement priorities [13].

4. What is missing from the provided materials and why those gaps matter

The supplied analyses repeatedly note absent or partial data: several items explicitly state they do not provide a top-five list for 2025 arrests and instead offer contextual statistics on detention, removals, or population size [2] [12] [5]. Missing elements include harmonized cross-agency tallies combining ICE, CBP, and Department of Homeland Security-wide encounters; disaggregation by enforcement category (e.g., border apprehension vs interior arrest); and time‑series comparisons that would show whether the 2025 rankings are consistent with prior years [4] [3]. Those omissions mean any claim about “top origin countries” must be read as agency-specific and time-limited, not a definitive portrait of all unauthorized migration in 2025.

5. Bottom line: how to use the available numbers responsibly today

Use the ICE arrest counts as the best available direct answer for ICE operations in 2025—Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua—but qualify that as ICE arrests by citizenship, not a universal ranking of all illegal entries or demographic origins across agencies [1] [5]. Note that broader research and political reporting highlight changing enforcement priorities that influence these totals and that other reputable sources do not replicate a single, consolidated top-five list in the supplied materials [2] [3] [14]. For a fully corroborated, cross-agency picture, request the latest CBP encounter breakdowns and DHS consolidated arrest/removal tables and compare year‑over‑year trends to separate enforcement-caused shifts from underlying migration flows [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Which countries accounted for the largest number of noncitizen arrests by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in fiscal year 2025?
How did the nationality breakdown of migrants encountered at the U.S.-Mexico border change between 2023, 2024, and 2025?
What factors drove increases in migrants from (specific country) to the U.S. in 2025, including policy, violence, and economic conditions?
How do U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement removals by nationality in 2025 compare to apprehensions at the border?
What sources and methodologies do DHS, CBP, and independent NGOs use to classify and report migrants’ countries of origin in 2025?