Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How has the Venezuelan government's relationship with cartels impacted regional drug trade?
Executive Summary
The core claim across reporting is that elements of the Venezuelan state—particularly military officers—have enabled and in some cases directed large-scale cocaine trafficking, creating a de facto partnership between state actors and organized criminal groups that has reshaped regional drug flows. U.S. designations, indictments, and prosecutions between 2024 and 2025 frame this as both a corruption-and-security crisis and an operational change in how cocaine moves through Venezuela to markets in the Caribbean, Central America, the U.S., West Africa and Europe [1] [2] [3].
1. The sharpest allegation: a military-linked “Cartel of the Suns” running transnational cocaine logistics
Reporting and official actions assert that a network known as the Cartel of the Suns comprises cells within Venezuela’s military, with senior officers allegedly guaranteeing security, authorizing flights, manipulating radar, and protecting shipments. U.S. Treasury and State actions in 2025 escalate this framing by tying the network to international cartels such as Sinaloa and to insurgent groups like the FARC and ELN, and by describing military-grade assistance and facilitation of multi-ton shipments [1] [4] [5]. Court cases and guilty pleas—such as the 2024 sentencing of an alleged top member—provide prosecutorial evidence of weapons transfers and protection for drug shipments, adding legal weight to the allegation that state actors are operational partners, not merely corrupt facilitators [6] [3].
2. How officials say the relationship changes routes, capacity and partnerships
Analyses indicate that Venezuelan territory has become a major transit corridor because corrupted officials reduce interception risk and provide logistical services, shifting trafficking routes across the Caribbean, Central America, West Africa and Europe. Reports emphasize practical enablers: safe passage guarantees, aircraft arrival/departure authorizations, and radar manipulation that collectively increase shipment throughput and lower loss risk for traffickers, which in turn incentivizes alliances between Venezuelan networks and Mexican cartels or guerrilla groups producing cocaine [4] [2]. These operational changes push traffickers to consolidate longer, more secure routes through Venezuelan-controlled air and maritime space, expanding regional market reach and complicating interdiction efforts.
3. U.S. designations, rewards and strikes: pressure, prosecution, and contested legality
From formal rewards for Maduro’s capture to Treasury “Specially Designated” labels and U.S. prosecutions, U.S. actions in 2024–2025 signal a hardline approach linking Venezuelan leadership to narco-terrorism. The State Department’s increased reward and Treasury sanctions portray criminal-state nexus as a national-security threat warranting aggressive tools [1] [5]. At the same time, U.S. interdiction tactics—such as strikes on alleged drug vessels in late 2025—have provoked international legal and diplomatic pushback, including concerns about proportionality and mistaken identity, showing that enforcement escalations carry geopolitical and legal costs that can complicate regional cooperation and may inflame bilateral tensions [7] [8].
4. Alternative readings and analytic cautions: chaos, regulation, and the “cartel” label
Several analysts and sources question treating the Cartel of the Suns as a monolithic organization, arguing instead for a diffuse pattern of state regulation of criminal economies and widespread corruption that produces cartel-like outcomes without centralized command. Some experts emphasize the regime’s patchwork control over illicit markets—fuel smuggling, mining, and local extortion—that can function like organized networks without a single boss, complicating investigative narratives and legal strategies [9] [8]. This raises evidentiary and policy questions: is the problem central leadership culpability or decentralized capture of state functions by criminal actors? The distinction matters for sanctions, prosecutions, and potential diplomatic engagement.
5. What’s missing from public accounts and why it matters for regional policy
Open reporting and government actions focus on links to Sinaloa, FARC, and ELN and on prosecutions, but they understate how trafficking dynamics reshape partner incentives in transit states, how local economies adapt to illicit rents, and how regional enforcement gaps—from weak prosecutions to air- and maritime surveillance shortfalls—sustain the problem [1] [2]. The legal record (guilty pleas, indictments) supports targeted criminal accountability, but addressing supply-side shifts requires coordinated intelligence-sharing, maritime and airspace monitoring upgrades, and anti-corruption reforms that target institutional capture rather than only individual actors [6] [2].
6. Bottom line: a transformed regional trade that blends state enablement with criminal networks
Available evidence from 2024–2025 shows a qualitative change in the regional drug trade: Venezuelan state actors have not merely tolerated trafficking but in many reported instances facilitated and protected it, altering routes, increasing shipment volumes, and deepening ties with transnational cartels and insurgent producers. Policy responses have combined sanctions, legal prosecutions and kinetic interdictions, but they face limits given legal concerns, geopolitical fallout, and persistent ambiguity about organizational structures versus systemic corruption. Addressing the phenomenon requires synchronized criminal justice action, regional capacity-building, and sustained tracking of how state-level facilitation reshapes traffickers’ strategic choices [1] [3] [7].