What did the 2016 court complaint filed as Katie Johnson specifically allege against Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump?

1. The core allegations: sexual assault, rape and “sex slave” conduct

The complaint alleged that in the summer of 1994 the plaintiff, using the name Katie Johnson, was lured to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse as a 13‑year‑old seeking modeling work and was subjected to repeated sexual and physical abuse by both Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump, including forcible rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment; the filing contains graphic descriptions that portray the defendants as taking turns assaulting her and forcing her into “perverted and depraved” sex acts while threatening harm to her and her family and effectively making her their “sex slave” ^{[1] [2] [5] [4]}.

2. Specific incidents and allegations named in the papers

In the versions of the complaint that circulated in media reporting, the plaintiff described multiple episodes: being forced to give massages in underwear, an episode in which Trump allegedly took her virginity while another 13‑year‑old was present, and a later episode in which Epstein allegedly attempted anal and vaginal rape and restrained her until he finished; the complaint framed these events as part of a pattern of predation at Epstein’s gatherings ^{[2] [4] [6]}.

3. What the filings sought and how they were styled

The initial Riverside, California federal complaint filed in April 2016 sought substantial damages—reports cite a $100 million figure—and used both the pseudonym “Katie Johnson” and, later, a “Jane Doe” designation in related filings; plaintiffs’ attorneys amended and refiled versions in 2016 in multiple jurisdictions before ultimately withdrawing or having some versions dismissed ^{[7] [4] [8]}.

4. Case disposition, judicial findings and procedural irregularities

Federal judges did not reach merits findings of proven facts: a magistrate judge dismissed the April complaint in May 2016 for failing to state a valid federal claim, and a New York filing tied to the same allegations was dismissed or voluntarily withdrawn in November 2016 after counsel filed a one‑page notice of dismissal; court dockets reflect the filings, assignment to judges, and termination entries rather than a trial or adjudication on guilt ^{[7] [3] [8]}.

5. Corroboration, media coverage and competing narratives

Reporting on the complaint was highly contested: some outlets published the complaint’s graphic allegations and interview excerpts from the pseudonymous plaintiff, while others reported that the story lacked corroborative evidence and quoted sources asserting fabrication or inconsistencies; the Daily Mail published pieces suggesting the claim was fabricated, while outlets such as PBS, Newsweek and Courthouse News summarized the complaint’s content and the fact of its dismissal or withdrawal ^{[5] [6] [8] [3]}.

6. Wider factual context reporters noted but did not prove

Coverage also placed the complaint against a broader backdrop—Epstein’s documented history of sex‑offender convictions and social ties to wealthy men, and recorded instances of Trump socializing with Epstein in the 1990s—while noting reporters have not found independent evidence that Trump and Epstein continued communicating after 2004; these contextual facts are cited separately from the Katie Johnson complaint’s unproven allegations ^[1].

Conclusion: what the 2016 complaint did and did not establish

The 2016 Katie Johnson complaint explicitly alleged that Epstein and Trump raped and repeatedly sexually abused a 13‑year‑old at Epstein’s Manhattan residence in 1994, describing forcible acts, threats and a conspiracy to exploit her; however, the federal cases were dismissed or withdrawn in 2016 and did not result in judicial findings corroborating the allegations, and major outlets and court records document procedural endings rather than adjudicated guilt ^{[2] [3] [7] [8]}.