Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the crime rates in blue states versus red states in 2024?
Executive Summary
Crime trends in 2024 show a national decline in violent and property crime according to FBI summaries cited in the analyses, but comparisons framed as “blue versus red states” are inconclusive because the available datasets and reporting referenced do not provide a consistent, state-by-state partisan breakdown for 2024. State-level outliers exist in both blue and red states, and commentators from different sources use different years and slices of FBI data to make partisan claims [1] [2] [3].
1. Why claims that “red states have higher crime” are common — and why they’re misleading
Writers asserting that red states have higher crime rates typically point to lists of high-crime states that lean Republican — for example, mentions of Alaska, Tennessee, and Louisiana — but those claims often rely on 2023 data or selective metrics, not a uniform 2024 partisan breakdown [3]. The analyses show authors cherry-pick years and jurisdictions to support a narrative; some pieces explicitly use FBI UCR 2023 extracts while others refer to maps and state rankings compiled at different times. That inconsistency means headline comparisons across “blue versus red” are not directly supported by a single, consistent 2024 dataset in the materials provided [3].
2. The FBI and national trends: 2024 shows declines, but not partisan slices
Multiple summaries report national declines in 2024 violent crime and murders, with figures like a 4% drop in violent crime and double-digit reductions in murders in certain FBI releases and mid-year reports [1] [2] [4]. These national-level statements are clear: the country saw falling crime rates in 2024 and in some quarters of 2025. However, the FBI releases cited do not supply a ready-made “blue vs. red” classification for each state tied to the 2024 calendar, so national declines do not resolve claims about partisan differences at the state level [1] [2].
3. State-level maps and rankings: conflicting snapshots and the New Mexico example
A 2024 map referenced indicates New Mexico as the highest state crime rate and New Hampshire the lowest, demonstrating that some high-crime states are politically mixed or blue-leaning, undermining blanket partisan assertions [5]. Analyses note that state rankings fluctuate year-to-year and that some blue states such as California and New Mexico appear on high-crime lists alongside red states like Arkansas or Tennessee in other reports. This crossover highlights that political color alone does not map cleanly onto crime rankings in the sourced material [5] [3].
4. City-level concentrations complicate state comparisons
Several analyses stress that crime is often concentrated in specific cities — for example, Memphis, St. Louis, and Oakland — meaning state averages can obscure urban hotspots and rural areas with very different trends [2]. Reports citing city data show that both blue and red states contain municipalities with severe violent-crime problems; state-level party control won’t necessarily account for municipal policing, socioeconomic conditions, or reporting practices. Therefore, city-level dynamics are essential context that the “blue vs red” frame often omits [2].
5. Temporal mismatches: 2023 versus 2024 versus 2025 data
The sourced analyses mix years: some rely on 2023 FBI UCR extracts, others cite 2024 FBI reports and mid-year comparisons, and still others discuss 2025 declines, creating temporal patchwork that weakens direct partisan comparisons for 2024 [3] [2] [6]. Because crime rates can shift meaningfully year-to-year, concluding that one political grouping had higher crime in 2024 requires a consistent state-level dataset for that year — which is not present in the supplied analyses. The mixed-dated sourcing is a core reason why partisan claims remain unsettled [3] [7] [6].
6. Alternative explanations the partisan framing overlooks
Analyses repeatedly point to nonpartisan drivers — urbanization, poverty, policing practices, data-reporting differences, and localized surges like auto thefts — that better explain state and city crime patterns than a binary red/blue label [6] [7]. Insurance and law-enforcement impacts from property-crime waves, cybercrime growth, and concentrated urban violence are documented in these sources; these phenomena cut across political boundaries and suggest that policy effects and socioeconomic context deserve more attention than partisan attribution alone [6] [7].
7. What the evidence supports and what it doesn’t for 2024 comparisons
The provided material supports two firm points: [8] U.S. crime trended downward in 2024 in national FBI reports, and [9] high-crime states and cities exist across the political spectrum [1] [2] [5]. The evidence does not, however, provide a single, validated state-by-state partisan breakdown for 2024 that would allow a definitive “blue vs red” crime-rate comparison. Claims that one color systematically had higher crime in 2024 rest on mixed-year, selective, or city-focused data instead of a consistent statewide 2024 dataset [3] [4].
8. Bottom line for readers demanding a clear answer
If you need a rigorous blue-versus-red comparison for 2024, the current materials show insufficient uniform evidence to make a definitive claim; available sources document national declines and mixed state-level patterns across 2023–2025 and emphasize city hotspots and other drivers [1] [5] [2]. To settle the question requires compiling a single, state-level 2024 dataset tied to a defined partisan classification and controlling for urbanization and socioeconomic factors — a task not completed by the analyses provided here [7] [6].