Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Fact check: How many of those deported from the US in 2025 actually had serious convictions
Executive Summary
The claim that most people deported from the United States in 2025 were convicted of serious crimes is not supported by the available data: multiple analyses of ICE statistics show that a large share of detainees and deportees had no criminal convictions or only minor offenses, while ICE and administration statements emphasize arrests of people with serious convictions such as murder or sexual assault. Contrasting datasets and official claims point to a mixed picture where some high-profile removals of violent offenders occurred, but aggregate data and independent analyses indicate that a substantial portion of removals involved people without serious criminal records [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. Why headlines emphasized violent offenders—and what the numbers actually show
Administration and ICE briefings highlighted arrests and removals of people described as the “worst of the worst,” citing figures such as hundreds convicted or accused of murder or sexual assault during enforcement sweeps; for example, ICE reported 498 accused or convicted of murder, 1,329 accused or convicted of sex offenses, and 2,288 gang members in its early 100-day summary [2]. These figures demonstrate that some deportations targeted violent offenders, but the ICE summaries do not provide a clear denominator for total deportations, making it impossible to conclude from those numbers alone that most deported individuals had serious convictions [2] [1].
2. Independent analyses find most deported people lacked serious convictions
Investigations by news organizations and data projects estimated that a large share of deportations involved people without criminal convictions or with only minor offenses. The Marshall Project and other reporters found that about two-thirds of over 120,000 people deported between January and May 2025 had no criminal convictions, and an additional portion had only the misdemeanor or immigration offense of illegal entry [4]. Independent ICE detention breakdowns similarly show that the largest detained group lacked a criminal conviction, which contradicts claims that removals were predominantly of serious criminals [3] [6].
3. ICE detention snapshots vs. deportation totals: apples and oranges
Multiple datasets cited by both supporters and critics of the administration focus on different populations—current ICE detainees, people arrested, or those already deported—creating confusion. ICE’s public trackers list arrests of people with murder and sexual-assault convictions but do not specify how many of those arrested were ultimately deported, while detention snapshots show that 71–72% of current detainees had no criminal convictions, a metric that refers to custody composition rather than final removals [1] [7] [3]. The divergence in denominators and timing means the same raw counts can be framed to support contrasting narratives.
4. Court rulings and enforcement episodes that complicate the narrative
Judicial challenges and specific deportation attempts highlight legal limits and selective enforcement. A Reuters account described a court ruling finding an attempted deportation to South Sudan violated an order, emphasizing due-process constraints and destination issues rather than systemic criminality among deportees [8]. These legal setbacks illustrate that enforcement actions often raise procedural and humanitarian questions independent of claims about the criminality of those removed [8].
5. Government messaging versus independent reporting: differing agendas
Official ICE and administration releases underscore public-safety framing by tallying arrests tied to violent crimes and gangs, a strategy that bolsters perceptions of enforcement targeting serious offenders [2]. Independent reporters and advocacy-minded analyses focus on aggregate detention and removal patterns showing many detainees without convictions, a framing that emphasizes civil-rights and policy concerns [4] [5]. Both viewpoints rely on the same underlying government data but select different metrics—counts of specific criminal convictions versus proportions of detainees with no convictions—revealing competing agendas in how data are presented.
6. What the data do and do not prove about 2025 deportations
The data prove that some individuals deported or arrested in 2025 were convicted of violent crimes, with explicit counts for murder and sexual assault arrests recorded by ICE and summarized by outlets [1] [2]. The data also show that a substantial share of those in ICE custody or removed over specific intervals had no criminal convictions or only minor offenses, according to independent analyses and detention statistics [3] [4] [7]. What the datasets do not prove is the simple, single-sentence claim that “most deported people in 2025 had serious convictions,” because different metrics yield contradictory answers depending on the denominator and time window [1] [4].
7. Bottom line and what to watch next
Short-term enforcement tallies of violent convictions coexist with broader trends showing many detainees and deportees without serious criminal records; therefore, the overall claim that most deported in 2025 had serious convictions is unsupported by the weight of the available analyses. Moving forward, clarity requires ICE to publish consistent, transparent breakdowns that align arrests, convictions, and final removals over the same periods; absent that, public debate will continue to hinge on selective statistics and competing narratives [1] [6] [5].