Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed over 400 legal actions against the Trump administration so far in 2025, from defending voting rights to upholding the Constitution.

Checked on August 28, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses reveal a significant lack of verification for the specific claim that the ACLU has filed over 400 legal actions against the Trump administration in 2025. While multiple sources confirm ongoing legal activity by the ACLU, none provide the comprehensive numerical data needed to substantiate this precise figure.

The sources do document specific legal actions taken by the ACLU against the Trump administration, including:

  • A lawsuit regarding unlawful policies of arresting people attending mandated court hearings [1]
  • Legal challenges to policies banning non-citizens from accessing community health and education programs [2]
  • A lawsuit to assess federal government's use of data to target voters [3]
  • Supreme Court cases involving congressional control of federal funding [4]

However, no source provides a total count or comprehensive tracking of all ACLU legal actions against the Trump administration for 2025 [5] [1] [2] [6] [7] [3] [8] [9] [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement lacks crucial context about the methodology for counting legal actions. The analyses show that ACLU activities include various forms of legal engagement - from filing public comments to full lawsuits to Supreme Court cases [2] [4]. Without clarification of what constitutes a "legal action," the 400 figure becomes meaningless.

The statement also omits the broader landscape of voting rights litigation. The sources reveal extensive ongoing voting rights cases and challenges to the Voting Rights Act, but these may involve multiple organizations and span different time periods [6] [7]. The ACLU's role in this broader ecosystem is not clearly delineated in the available analyses.

Political organizations and fundraising entities would benefit significantly from promoting narratives about extensive legal resistance, as such claims can drive donations and political engagement. The ACLU itself has financial incentives to highlight the volume of their legal work when soliciting public support.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement presents a highly specific numerical claim (400+ legal actions) without providing verifiable documentation. This precision suggests access to comprehensive data that the analyses fail to corroborate from available sources [5] [1] [2] [6] [7] [3] [8] [9] [4].

The framing "defending voting rights to upholding the Constitution" employs loaded language that presents the ACLU's actions as inherently virtuous, potentially biasing readers toward accepting the numerical claim without scrutiny. This rhetorical approach obscures the need for factual verification of the specific figure cited.

The statement may also conflate different types of legal activities or include actions from previous years, as the sources show ongoing cases and legal challenges that span multiple time periods [7] [8]. Without transparent methodology for counting and categorizing these actions, the 400 figure remains unsubstantiated based on the available evidence.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the key issues in the ACLU's lawsuits against the Trump administration in 2025?
How has the ACLU's defense of voting rights impacted election policies in the United States?
What role has the ACLU played in shaping constitutional law under the Trump administration?
Which specific Trump administration policies have been challenged by the ACLU in court?
How do the ACLU's legal actions against the Trump administration compare to those against other presidential administrations?