Which federal, state, and local agencies obtained physical evidence from Little St. James and on what dates?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple federal and local law‑enforcement entities searched Jeffrey Epstein’s Little St. James and collected physical evidence in the immediate aftermath of his death in August 2019 and in follow‑on actions through 2020; reporting identifies the Federal Bureau of Investigation and New York Police Department as principal federal/local searchers days after Epstein’s death (early August 2019), U.S. Virgin Islands authorities conducting documented work in 2020, and the Department of Justice later releasing files and images derived from those searches (2019–2025), though no single public log of every agency and exact chain‑of‑custody dates is available in the sources reviewed [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. FBI and NYPD: the post‑mortem raids in August 2019
News reports and contemporaneous memos state that FBI agents and New York Police Department investigators executed searches of Little St. James in the days immediately after Epstein’s death on August 10, 2019, with the FBI describing a seizure of “a significant amount of material, including more than 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence,” and investigative photos cataloged from an August 12, 2019 search appearing in later releases [1] [4] [2].
2. U.S. Virgin Islands authorities: documented activity in 2020 and photo evidence
U.S. Virgin Islands law‑enforcement personnel are explicitly credited with taking images of the island in 2020 that later were included among previously unseen photos released by congressional investigators and in public reporting, indicating local territorial authorities conducted documented on‑site investigative work and evidence collection in 2020 [3] [5].
3. Department of Justice: file releases and memos that reference the seizures (2019–2025)
The U.S. Department of Justice has begun to release investigative files and memos that reference physical evidence seized from Little St. James during the 2019 actions, with reporting citing a July 2025 FBI memo and DOJ document releases that include redacted photos and listings tied to searches conducted in August 2019 [2] [4].
4. Congressional and media disclosures: images, dates of release, and limits of public record
House Oversight Committee releases and media stories provided never‑before‑seen photos and videos—publicly released in December 2025—that derive from U.S. Virgin Islands authorities’ 2020 imagery and from the earlier seizures; these disclosures clarify what was collected but do not replace a formal, comprehensive inventory showing every agency that touched physical evidence, the exact dates each item was taken into custody, or full chain‑of‑custody records in the public domain [3] [5] [4].
5. What the public record does not show and why that matters
The assembled reporting names key actors—the FBI, NYPD, U.S. Virgin Islands authorities and the Department of Justice as the agency releasing records—but the sources do not publish a complete, itemized chain‑of‑custody or a chronological log attributing every specific piece of physical evidence to a particular agency on a particular date, so definitive answers about every agency and every date cannot be drawn from these sources alone; transparency advocates and congressional investigators have pressed for fuller disclosure, and public releases to date amount to partial inventories and selected imagery rather than a full evidentiary ledger [2] [3] [4].
6. Alternative explanations and institutional incentives
Different outlets emphasize different pieces of the record—some stress the FBI’s massive digital seizure to show investigatory scale [4], others foreground territorial authorities’ 2020 imagery to highlight local involvement [3]—and institutional incentives (federal prosecutorial priorities, territorial resource limits, congressional oversight aims) shape what gets disclosed and when; the available reporting suggests coordinated multi‑agency activity but leaves open questions about the precise timing and custody of every physical item [4] [3] [2].