Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are AK-47 style rifles commonly used in U.S. violent crime statistics?
Executive Summary
AK-47–style rifles are not commonly used in U.S. violent crime overall; the bulk of firearm crime is committed with handguns, while rifles of all types account for a small single-digit share of homicides and violent incidents in national data [1] [2] [3]. Analysts and advocacy groups diverge on emphasis: some highlight the low overall percent of crimes involving rifles, while others stress that semi‑automatic “assault rifles” have outsized lethality in mass shootings, a contested framing with different policy implications [4] [5].
1. Why the headline numbers point to handguns, not AK-47s
National surveys and compilations show handguns overwhelmingly dominate the weapons used in violent crime and homicide. Bureau of Justice statistics are cited as showing roughly 86% of firearm-related crimes involve handguns, with rifles comprising only a small fraction of incidents overall [1]. FBI and other summaries put rifles at around 2–3% of homicides in recent years, with handguns constituting the plurality or majority of firearm homicides [2] [3]. Statista’s 2023 breakdown records 7,159 murders by handguns versus 511 by rifles, underscoring that rifles in general, and by extension AK‑style rifles, represent a minority share of violent deaths [6]. This pattern is consistent across national datasets cited in these analyses.
2. Why some studies single out “assault” rifles despite low overall share
Several researchers and advocacy organizations emphasize that semi‑automatic assault-style rifles can cause disproportionately higher casualties in single events, particularly public mass shootings, even if they are rare across all crimes [5] [7]. A 2018 literature review and follow-up local studies estimate assault weapons account for a variable fraction—reports cite ranges like 2–12% of guns used in crime or under 7% in many estimates—reflecting differences in definitions and local samples [4]. Giffords and similar groups highlight that where assault rifles are used, fatalities per incident can be much higher, which explains why advocates treat them as a distinct policy target despite their small share of aggregate incidents [5]. That framing prioritizes lethality per event over frequency across all crimes.
3. Reconciling divergent percentages: data, definitions, and context matter
Apparent differences in reported percentages arise from varying definitions (rifle vs. assault rifle vs. AK‑style), time frames, and data sources. Some sources aggregate all rifles together, others attempt to isolate semiautomatic “assault” models; local studies can show higher local concentrations than national averages [8] [4]. The 2.6% rifle homicide share cited for 2019 and the Statista 2023 counts illustrate consistent low national shares for rifles overall, while targeted studies report higher shares for “assault weapons” in certain samples [2] [6] [4]. These methodological differences explain why commentators can truthfully say both that AK-47–style weapons are rare in general criminal use and also that they appear frequently in some high-fatality mass shootings.
4. What different stakeholders emphasize and why their agendas matter
Advocacy organizations focused on firearm safety emphasize the lethality and public mass-shooting association of assault‑style rifles, using case-focused statistics to argue for bans or restrictions [5]. Industry groups and some analysts underscore the low percentage of crimes involving rifles overall and argue policy should target handguns or broader violence prevention measures instead [2] [8]. Both framings rely on selective slices of data: one highlights casualty severity per event, the other the share of total incidents. Recognizing these agendas clarifies that disputes are often about policy priorities—reducing total homicide counts versus preventing mass-casualty incidents—rather than pure disagreement over baseline facts [4] [3].
5. Bottom line for interpreting the claim and unanswered gaps
The claim “AK‑47 style rifles are commonly used in U.S. violent crime” is not supported by national aggregate datasets: rifles account for a small percentage of homicides and most violent gun crimes involve handguns [1] [2] [3]. At the same time, semi‑automatic assault rifles are documented contributors to many high‑fatality mass shootings, which fuels policy debate and public concern disproportionate to their overall incidence [5] [7]. Critical remaining gaps include standardized national coding that reliably distinguishes AK‑style and other assault‑pattern rifles in crime reports, and more recent, harmonized local-to-national studies to reconcile divergent estimates [4] [6].